Phase Locked Loops for 30-50MHz

Hi everybody:

I need to take an input clock signal and reproduce a phase locked, identical frequency output signal. The problem is that the input signal is 30 - 50 MHz. Now the other problem: the PLL must acheive lock in under 30 - 35us. Do y'all have any recommendations for PLL ICs that will work with these specifications?

TI has the most promising ICs, but the lock times might be to long. I have contacted TI to see if they can give me a better estimate using my freq. ranges, but thought I would ask around for other IC recommendations in the meantime.

The two TI ICs are:

1.)
formatting link
2.)
formatting link

Another question that I had was this: some of the Philips PLL don't have an upper freq. limit on their VCO, how is this possible? Specifically HEF4046B.

Thanks in advance, Austin McElroy

Reply to
utbiomedicaleng
Loading thread data ...

Have you considered a non "chip" design? You say you want to lock on a incoming 30-50 mhz. I dont have the schematics of this with me today but I could scan them in tomarrow. I have a book at home with a simple circuit used to lock a vco at harmonics of 1 mhz, but it would not be hard to hack it to go 1:1 with a input frequency. I have built the circuit and it works well. I'm assuming you want to demodulate something with the VCO control voltage?

simple first order loop: incoming signal is buffered then goes into one side of a mini-circuits phase detector. Other side is fed by a POS-70 VCO also from minicircuits, via a isolation amp, say a MAR-4. The phase detector output goes to a fast opamp that adds gain and offset, output of opamp goes to a three or four component passive filter then to VCO control voltage. No dividers, no programming, no math. Has a tendancy to be able to lock up on subharmonics and harmonics though.

I'm not a expert in PLLs by any means, but from your description this sounds like it would do what you want.

Steve Roberts

Reply to
osr

Thanks you for the response:

I have considered a non-IC design, but I am worried that a hand built circuit would have even worse lock times than a proffesionally designed circuit. I am pretty new to PLL and besides the lock issue, those ICs look like they fit the bill, depending if I wanted to go analog or digital.

I will not be demodulating anything, i just need to get a 1:1 signal out.

Thanks, Austin McElroy

Reply to
utbiomedicaleng

OK obvious question...if you already have the signal ....why not just use the signal itself .....why do you need a PLL?

Reply to
Mark

That's odd. On page 8 of the data sheet I'm looking at:

formatting link
it says, "Maximum operating frequency", and it has three values for Vdd of

5, 10, and 15V.

Good Luck! Rich

Reply to
Rich Grise

Again, thanks for the replys.

To Mark:

The signal dies off after a few micro seconds, and we would like to keep it going after it dies down. This is why I need the fast lock time and the 1:1 output.

To Rich:

The 3 Voltages are just for 3 different power states, no big deal. There is no upper freq. listed on the spec sheet. Surely I can't use the VCO to ouput 30 GHz. Why is an upper freq for the 3 different power modes not listed?

Thanks, Austin McElroy

Reply to
utbiomedicaleng

I think your frequency is too high for this to work but I'll throw the idea in here because we may be able to adapt it:

Make your VCO run at many times the input frequency. Add some logic to the reset input of the feedback divider of the PLL. This logic holds the feedback divider reset until the signal arrives. At the first edge of the signal, the counter is allowed to start running in step with the signal.

The filter of the PLL contains some sort of multiplier function like a CA3080 or a LT1228 so that its bandwidth can initially be made very wide and then smoothly narrowed.

By starting the counter in phase, we can be certain that the error signal has the right phase at the start. The varying bandwidth means that this correct error signal will quickly bring us to almost the right frequency.

The smoothly narrowing bandwidth means that there is less of a tendancy to trap errors due to noise. For simple cases, the classic RC based exp(t/RC) shape is a good one to use. Your noise enviroment, will determine the ideal shape.

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net   forging knowledge
Reply to
Ken Smith

Well, if you can't figure out what this means:

Parameter VDD Symbol Min. Typ. Max Notes Maximum operating 5 0,5 1,0 MHz VCOIN at VDD; frequency 10 fmax 1,0 2,0 MHz R1 = 10 k; R2 = infinity; 15 1,3 2,7 MHz C1 = 50 pF

Then you're probably in the wrong line of work.

And yes, since the max. freq. at 15V Vdd is typically 2.7 MHz, then no, you can't use it at 30 MHz.

Good Luck! Rich

Reply to
Rich Grise

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.