OT: EV Charging Stations Stripped of Copper Cables

One kWh is nearly 3.6 million joules of energy.

Do EVs have catalytic converters (when hybrids are also banned)

The car alarm in a public place is the most ignored warning :)

And a kW/h is the rate of change of power.

Let's assume it's a hybrid.

He won't. He is lying twit.

None of which you have ever bothered to document.

None of which you have bothered to find or point us at. Inventing them takes a lot less effort.

Most people. do But the world is full of clowns who think that they get away with pretending that they do to justify all sorts of stupid delusions.

But the period when wind turbines got subsidised is long past.

Except that you haven't documented any of these imagined subsidies.

People were building long DC links long before renewables were a thing.

When I was a kid the UK and France strung a long cable across the English channel to exploit the difference in the timing of the peak demand on either side.

Kilowatt.hours and MegaWatt.hours seem to be popular. Alan m doesn't seem to be all that technical.

Being able to charge an electric car by parking it over an inductive charger doesn't stop you fast charging it through a plug-in cable.

Equipping the car for both may cost more money, but a socket for a plug-in cable won't be expensive, and enough customers are going to want to have the option available that there's always going to be an easily (and cheaply) fitted option.

The charging coil is going wrapped around the periphery of the car - the more receiving area you have the better it works.

The thieves that rip it off will have to make a lot more noise and move a lot more bulk than the ones that go after catalytic converters.

Catalytic converter theft doesn't seem to be a thing in Sydney. I certainly don't see an alarmist reports in the local newspapers or on TV.

You would be wrong, but I haven't mentioned anything about kW, kWh etc.

What a stupid question.

But you haven't made it to the 21st century yet. Put a 5G phone in the alarm system, and the police get notified automatically (with pictures of the crime scene while the crime is in progress).

But with 5G phone links and artificial intelligence, the alarm can be sent to places where it will get attention, not that you'd know anything about that.

So does everybody. In your case it's just as well. You totally lack the skills required to put together a paper that might get published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Cambridge Instruments did like to submit papers at conferences and publish them in more-or-less peer-reviewed journals, and I did a bit of that, but I did dislike what marketing did to the papers to get the publicity they wanted, and so did the editors and referees of quality journals.

On 7/4/24 16:11, Smolley wrote: [...]

I sure hope not.

First, transporting anything to the sun is *very* expensive. You'd need a delta-v of about 30km/s.

Second, putting radioactive waste on top of a vehicle with a track record of blowing up unpredictably and spectacularly is pure madness.

Jeroen Belleman

Dear Mr. Sloman, if you want to be taken seriously then you need drop the comment Norton is adding to your messages. Nobody with clue uses any Norton products in 2024.

Attention from.... who, exactly? The police in my country are all too busy watching screens for mean tweets. In the US, thieves are considered fine, upstanding and often oppressed people, who certainly shouldn't be bothered by nasty law-enforcers.

If it's dangerous, it must be emitting energy. Why are we burying free energy?

The 'unit' of electricity has featured on UK electricity bills since before I was born, and has always been 1kWh. It should really be capitalised to distinguish it from other, generic, units.