Newsweek: The Large Hadron Collider

Bubblicles?

/BAH

OK. Plonk.

"NO, I'M SPARTICLES!!!", times a mole.

Tim

"NO, I'M SPARTICLES!!!", times a mole.

Tim

What kind of article?

I'll give you that one! ;-)

Yep :-)))

/BAH

Hi my name is Conrad Countess and I have been waiting for this LHC to prove a point.

What if the only black whole is matter itself? A black hole is defined as a region where gravity is so strong that light cannot escape. We know that matter is composed of trapped light (confined energy), and I am betting that it is the only such trapped light or black whole. Besides, we know that when matter gets too dense, such as the radioactive elements at the end of the periodic table, it begins to expand, break up, and decay, not contract further. I wrote a book about a cosmic pattern of expansion/contraction that pervades the entire universe available at iuniverse.com. Unfortunately my website is down so I cannot give you a direct link to it, but if you Google =93CJCountess,=94 or Cosmic Alignment=94, it should come up. The universe unfolds in a pattern of expansion/contraction, and nowhere does it contract forever with out an alternating expansion or vice versa. Furthermore based on logic that everything is interrelated including space, I traced the origin of mass to space itself. Space has mass, as it has a ground state energy and energy =3D mass. The universe did not start with a big bang, matter condensed from space as a part of the pattern of expansion (space) and contraction (matter). And (E=3Dmc squared) =3D (E=3Dmc circled). In other words, energy =3D rest mass , (matter), at a frequency when energy is moving in circler and/or spherical motion,(circular frequency and standing spherical waves). Analogous to a line of 1 inch in horizontal direction multiplied by a line of 1 inch in the vertical direction to create a square inch, when the speed of light in the 90 degree angular direction equals and balances the speed of light in the linear direction, this is c^2 and results in a balance of centrifugal and centripetal forces, circular and/or spherical motion, and rest mass. Matter forms directly from the energy of space when the frequency is high enough to create circular and/or spherical motion. If this new LHC proves anything, it should prove this.

Conrad Countess

On Sep 13, 11:09 pm, "Androcles" wrote: [....]

During the 6 month winter you'd freeze.

It ain't necessarily so. I survive quite well in diverse social groups at the workplace, and elsewhere. I am a compulsive truth teller and straight shooter. I have many workplace friends today who only respected my position at first, then my technical expertise, then learned how to ask for help in a timely manner. I do not need gratuitous insult or irrelevant vocabulary to make my point. Indeed, gratuitous complements produces far better results.

I never believed in PC and can certainly explain how it is often abused. It has been tried against me, and never got better than a stalemate.

You are mistaken: Polish mathematicians worked out the mathematical algorithm for cracking the description, based on a German military model that the Polish intelligence acquired before the war. Turing then proceeded to implement this algorithm and the computer to run it, even though the Germans evolved the design even further in the meantime:

Function: noun Etymology: Late Greek oxym?ron, from neuter of oxym?ros pointedly foolish, from Greek oxys sharp, keen + m?ros foolish Date: 1657 : a combination of contradictory or incongruous words (as cruel kindness) ; broadly : something (as a concept) that is made up of contradictory or incongruous elements

Example: "Polish mathematician".

Example 2: "Androcles' ideas"

The "cracking" only happened near the end of the war. The Polish mathematicians did come up with a partial solution but, early on, it required sloppy practices by the Germans to get the foot hold. Late in the war, the machine made by IIRC a guy named Flowers finally automated the process or code breaking. It was at that point in the war that the true cracking of the code happened.

Yes and also copies of the patents.

Not Turing. He came up with the algorithm but it was Flowers who made the machine and another guy IIRC Roberts who spotted a flaw in the encryption method that the enigma did. The flaw was that the enigma always replaces a letter with a different letter. It doesn't ever return the same letter.

The machine was actually made for the second generation of German codes.

If everything is relative, what is everything relative to?

Everything else.

Chris

Anything... but you.

Everything else. Hope that helps.

-- Les Cargill