snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote: >
The same religious bullcrap from the compulsive w.
Still never a link to another lunatic that agrees with w that plug-in suppressors do not work.
Still never answers to simple questions:
- Why do the only 2 examples of protection in the IEEE guide use plug-in suppressors?
- Why does the NIST guide says plug-in suppressors are "the easiest solution"?
- Why does the NIST guide say "One effective solution is to have the consumer install" a multiport plug-in suppressor?
- Why do w's "responsible companies" make plug-in suppressors?
- Why does "responsible company" SquareD say "electronic equipment may need additional protection by installing plug-in [suppressors] at the point of use"?
For real science read the IEEE and NIST guides. Both say plug-in suppressors are effective.