I purchased a transformer with the following advertised spec. "100-Ohm CT to Dual 1.5Meg-Ohm audio Transformer" I have picture with the data here.
formatting link
I need a couple of things cleared up. First I note two separate 1.5M windings for ZL. The Zs has a CT. 100 ohm winding. Does that mean 100 ohms from pin 1 to pin 3 or pin 1 to pin 2?
I suspect the 1.5M actually means 1.5K ohms because I get no where near the 1.5M ohms I expected. Is that possible? I'm measuring at 2 khz.
I see the 1.33 x 10^-6 watts ratting, I think that's tiny, any possibility the 1.5M ohms is correct, I'm just overdriving the transformer. I have a nice signwave in and out.
I was hoping to use this for a crystal radio as a high impedance load to the tank/diode circuit. But I don't think I got what was advertised. Any advice about how to test this? Thanks, MikeK
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
A
amdx
ya, SINEWAVE
A
amdx
Here's a picture of measurements I made. I can't make sense of it.
formatting link
J
J. Todd
Hi Mike, I think you need to view the _ratio_ of impedances (turns ratio squared) when matching. The absolute impedances of the windings are much less important at low power levels.
A
amdx
I'm not sure what I can do with that info. I bought it as a 1.5 meg ohm to 100 ohm transformer or 122 to 1 turns ratio. So I'd like to put a 64 ohm set of earbuds on it and see 960,000 ohms. I don't see how that's going to happen. MikeK
J
J. Todd
So load the sec. with 64 ohms, and measure the pri. impedance.
T
Tim Wescott
It may be specifying the impedances of the generator and loads needed to maintain the specified performance, rather than the matched impedance ratio of the transformer (I'm reaching, here).
I'd pop a sine wave onto pins 1 and 3, and measure the amplitude of the wave out on pins 6 & 7, or 4 & 5. Then I'd do it going the other way. That should tell you the turns ratio, independent of any design impedances. An output impedance of 1.5x10^6 ohms seems pretty big -- a
13pF capacitor has that much capacitive reactance at 8kHz. I'd say "no way!", except that it's certainly a pro-appearing transformer.
What instrument are you using to measure impedances? Is there a chance that your audio impedance measurements are off?
Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
Do you need to implement control loops in software?
"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" was written for you.
See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
R
Robert Baer
Yes; 100 ohm 1-3; refer to filament transformer citation standards or protocol. It is extremely reasonable that the "M" stands for "thousands". If you were over-driving the transformer, you would see peak clipping, and if you monitored input current, you would see exponential-like rise near the peak. Best ou could do is drive 50 ohms 1-2 and put secondaries in series for 3K Z.
Start with the basics and give us the dc resistances. On your page of figures there just isnt enough info on there to make sense of them.
NT
B
Baron
amdx Inscribed thus:
That could be the audio phasing transformer for a sideband rig.
Best Regards:
Baron.
A
amdx
I measured the DC resistance of the windings, that was enough to convince me that I didn't get the transformer that I wanted.or that the company specified. Pin 1 to 3 = 75 ohms Pin 1 to 2 = 37 ohms Pin 2 to 3 = 37 oihms. Pin 4 to 5 =130 ohms Pin 6 to 7= 130 ohms.
Oddities All measurements at 2 khz, phase shift is near zero Open circuit, 1 volt into Pin 1 and 3----- I get 1 volt out on Pin 6 and 7.
If I put 1.5 meg ohm between pins 6 and 7, looking into Pins 1 and 3, I see
100 kohms.
100 ohm load Pin 1 to 3---looking into Pin 6 and 7 = 325 ohms ( 0.38 volts ) ( 1 volt )
Then reversed hookup.
325 ohm load on Pin 6 to 7 --Looking into Pin 1 and 3 = 645 ohms. ( 0.75 volts ) ( 1 volt )
I still don't know what this transformer is supposed to transform, but I do know it is not 1.5 meg ohm to 100 ohm. Feedback appreciated. MikeK
P
Phil Allison
"amdx"
** The output windings are meant for a 1.5 kohms load.
Some makers in the past use the letter " M " for thousand - derived from Roman the number system.
A good rule is to multiply the winding resistance by 10 to estimate the rated load resistance for most audio transformers.
..... Phil
P
Phantom
How are you measuring impedances? Describe your method.
If the specs on the transformer mean 1500 ohms at pins 4-5 and 6-7, and you have
1.5k connected to pins 6-7 as in the top example, you should be measuring about
100 ohms across pins 1-3, not 1.33k. Something's wrong.
A
amdx
I will but you need to pay attention :-)
I copied a circuit that I used years ago to measure transducer impedances. I built this circuit;
formatting link
I connect a signal generator as a signal source so I can vary the frequency and amplitude. The circuit puts a current sensing resistor in series with the DUT. (device under test) A scope probe is across the current sensing resistor (say 10 ohms). The scope then displays the voltage across the resistor, with a little math we know the current through the DUT. (E/R=I) The second scope probe measures the voltage applied to the DUT. So now we know voltage and current and a little more math and we know the impedance.
I have only recently built the board and I had my own questions about it measuring properly. So, several times through this transformer measuring, I would get an impedance, (say 680 ohms) and just as a check I would put a 680 ohm resistor in as the DUT and verify that the scope had the same amplitudes showing on the scope as the orignal DUT. Also the phase can be checked, the phase was always near zero during these tests. The board probably isn't real important at 2 khz but at 500 khz or 1 Mhz you want to tighten up so parasitics don't interfere. Here's the schematic of the board, it might help in understanding.
formatting link
The sense resistor can be changed, I have used 1, 10, 100, 1k, amd 10k ohms depending on the impedance I'm measuring. The current sense resistor should be as small as possible and still develop enough voltage to see o n the scope. I would be nice to have a signal generator with a high output amplitude, my HP has about 3 volts max. when loaded 50 ohms, this works ok. The voltage is higher or lower depending on the impedance of the DUT.
If I didn't make this understandable, please let me know where I failed and I will try to make it clear. At this point I have requested an RA from the company I ordered the transformer from. It is not as advertised and I hope they will change there webpage. Thanks, MikeK
I agree "Something's wrong"
P
Paul G.
From the data you posted, it looks like the windings 1-3 to 6-7 have a 1:1 ratio. I don't usually see Zs and ZL printed on transformers, my guess is that for the correct operation of the transformer, it wants a source impedance of 100 ohms, and load impedances of 1.5 megohms on the two secondaries, i.e., wants very little loading. One way to check is to put a load of 1.5megohm on pins 6-7, and see if the reflected load on the primary is 1.5megohms. Most audio transformers would give you lower impedances because of stray capacitances and insufficient magnetizing inductance. This looks like a chopper transformer, where a rapidly switched DC voltage is connected to the transformer primary. An AC voltage at the switching frequency appears on the two secondaries, it is amplified and synchronously switched again, to provide an amplified DC voltage. I've worked on old chart recorders and DC amps that used such circuits. The transformers tend to be pretty small. The electrostatic shield is consistent with use as a low-level chopper. The frequency range is "off" for audio (300-3000Hz for communication), but would be reasonable for 1khz chopping in order to preserve the square wave for phase detection. Notice the low power levels... 1.33uw! The transformer is probably specially designed with high magnetizing inductance and low capacitance to minimize loading from the primary circuit.
Just a guess.... but it has specs on it that you don't usually see on audio stuff.
Paul G.
P
Phil Allison
"Paul Gormless Git."
** What the f*ck are you posting to ME for ????
** Absolute BOLLOCKS.
Piss off idiot.
P
Phantom
This is the same method you posted over on The Radio Board, isn't it?
Have you tried the method of measuring the image impedances of a transformer that was described there?
Measure the impedance at pins 1-3 with pins 6-7 shorted; call this Zis. Measure the impedance at pins 1-3 with pins 6-7 (and all others) open; call this Zio.
Calculate SQRT(Zis*Zio). This is the image impedance at pins 1-3. This will be the impedance to which the transformer will be best matched at pins 1-3.
Do the same thing in the other direction to find the image impedance at pins 6-7 (measure at 6-7 with 1-3 successively shorted and open).
A
amdx
Yes it is. When I saw the spec's for this transformer and series connection of 3 megohms, I thought even with the 1-8khz, + or - 0.2db specification, It might still work decently for a crystal radio. It is not to be.
I have not tried it. Just the DC resistance measurements alone have me convinced this is not a 1.5 meg transformer. I just hope to get a return authorization. If I get any time, it will be Thursday, I will try it then. Thanks. MikeK
A
amdx
220 ohms
108,000 Ohms
4919 Ohms
Measure the impedance at pins 6-7 with pins 1-3 shorted; call this Zis.
22 ohms
Measure the impedance at pins 6-7 with pins 1-3 open; call this Zio.
105,000 ohms
Calculate SQRT(Zis*Zio). This is the image impedance at pins 6-7. This will be the impedance to which the transformer will be best matched at pins 6-7.
1555 ohms
And as a last test, I put 100 ohms on pins 1-3 and the impedance seen at 6-7 is 330 ohms.
None of it makes sense to me. Anyone see what's going on? Thanks, Mike
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.