#Lying Bag Of Schiff

amdx wrote in news:qniuqa$cku$ snipped-for-privacy@dont-email.me:

More like # snipped-for-privacy@knology.netisretrarded

More like #lyingposamdxisabagofshit

Hillary lost. Get used to it.

Imagine if God's agent of divine providence on Earth (as the Evangelicals seem to believe) couldn't beat Hillary Clinton, huh? That would be pretty sad.

But be more careful about Russian interventions in the US electoral process next time around. The Russians didn't support Trump because they thought that he would be a effective president.

But be more careful about Russian interventions in the US electoral process next time around. The Russians didn't support Trump because they thought that he would be a effective president.

what makes you think Trump supporters care if Russians interfere in every election till the end of time or run the whole goddamn country, for that matter?

Hey John, is that a response to me, another edict to democrats or a response to the Decadent one? Or, do you not know who Schiff is? I need more context :-)

Mikek

Mueller said that the Russians didn't affect the outcome of the election. Dems need someone to blame. Read "Shattered" by Allen and Parnes. Great fun.

Funny how the left loved the Russians when they were Communists crushing eastern europe, forget the millions who died. Now that the Russians are sort of capitalists, they hate Russia and love China (who killed even more millions) and various Islamists, who treat women badly and hack up young girls.

Weird.

I'm hoping for a Trump landslide, just to see Rachel Maddow react again.

It's my general reaction to the movement to impeach him, which began before he was even inaugurated.

There was a headline somewhere recently:

Impeachment Is Boring

Pencil Neck? The Parody King?

Sorry.

It's not weird at all once you discover what their secret playbook is all about.

Fuck Maddow, I just want to see what Trump can do once he has settled into the job and found his feet. Right now he is still feeling his way. I think he deserves a second term for all his supposed faults. It would be great to see Hillary challenge him again - and lose. Again.

ocess next time around. The Russians didn't support Trump because they thou ght that he would be a effective president.

He didn't say anything of the sort. He said that the wasn't any evidence th at Trump had colluded with the Russian interventions on social media.

The Russian intervention was concentrated on the three small states where T rump got the 77,000 extra votes that won him his majority in the electoral college. It is very likely that the Russians did influence the outcome if t he election, but there's no way of knowing whether that intervention was cr ucial.

They didn't. Like the rest of America they loved the Russians when they wer e crushing Nazi Germany. Most of them lost their affection for the Russians after the Berlin airlift started. Even America's committed communists lost enthusiasm in 1956, when the Russians rolled into Hungary. One American ac quaintance of ours - now dead - who was a a card-carrying communist until 1

China (who killed even more millions) and various Islamists, who treat wome n badly and hack up young girls.

Genital mutilation isn't a Muslim thing. It's popular in some countries tha t are mostly Muslim, but ti certainly isn't prescribed in the Koran.

Democrats don't "love" China or Muslims. They just don't hate them with the mindless enthusiasm that Trump-supporting Republicans seem to think approp riate.

John Larkin's silly ideas are indeed weird.

A 41.6% approval rating isn't a great basis for a landslide. It has decline d surprisingly little since Trump's attempts to strong arm the Ukraine into fiding dirt of Biden became public, but people silly enough to approve of Trump are too silly to realise that this is obvious the sort of high crime and misdemeanour that justifies impeachment. John Larkin seems to be one of them.

The idea that have have a secret playbook isn't at all weird. It's just one more demented conspiracy theory, and Cursitor Doom has yet to find one which he finds implausible. He's the gold standard gullible twit, and John Larkin is close behind.

Cursitor Doom lacks imagination. So far Trump's trade wars have severely crimped global economic growth. Give him longer to find new ways to wreck our world and a rerun of the Great Depression has to be one of the possibilities.

The last minority president - George W Bush - gave us the global financial crisis, and Trump seems to have an even poorer grasp of reality.

It's a "demented conspiracy theory" as someone else put it. That there are millions of fruit-loop Trump-loving wingnuts in the US who shoot up people and threaten to shoot people constantly isn't any conspiracy theory it's a daily fact of modern life you can read about in any newspaper

The most appealing part of conspiracy theories to the paranoid and conspiracy-theory-minded is that the less evidence there is for them the more plausible they become.

The lack of any evidence just shows you how good "they" are at covering their tracks! They must be pretty strong and bad to be that good at it

Playbook? Mostly I see self-loathing and a desire to destroy.

The power players of course exploit this for fun and profit and power, but the basic mass energy source is hatred, much of that self-hatred.

Another great book in the making.

There certainly is a Deep State that sees Trump as a threat, that hates him and wants to destroy him and has contempt for the flyover yokels who elected him. DS is organized here and there, but really it's the aggregate of people who turn to government for profit and power, and those who are aggrieved by the perceived success and happiness of others. There's a lot of energy there to be exploited.

te:

hing

are

up

all

t one more demented conspiracy theory, and Cursitor Doom has yet to find on e which he finds implausible. He's the gold standard gullible twit, and Joh n Larkin is close behind.

None of that would be unreasonable if there was an kind of Deep State to do it.

It's more that most rational people do see Trump as a threat - he's made qu ite enough foolish and destructive choices already, with his trade wars as the prime example, to excite realistic anxieties.

Nobody needs to destroy him - just getting him out of office is all that is required.

The lack of judgement that would let you vote for Trump is unfortunate, but democracy does have to cope with the fact that half the population does ha ve below average intelligence. The kind of bad judgement that a more or les s intelligent person like John Larkin shows in failing to recognise Trump's defects is contemptible, but we do have lower expectations of people with less education. Tulane may be an excuse.

It would probably be more realistic to label the top 1% of the US income di stribution as a sort of deep state. They want their government to run thing s so that they get richer, and don't seem to have enough sense to realise t hat underpaying the rest of the population and short-changing them on healt h care, education and social welfare is reducing the productivity of their work force.

It's not so much a deep state as deeply stupid state of mind.

If you have time to spare and are having a conversation with such a person, it can be amusing to ask "is there any evidence that would allow you to change your mind?".

The normal response is a blank incomprehending stare.

I was "hacked up" as an infant in the US, by a US doctor. I believe it was (is?) standard practice.

FGM is a whole different ballpark, of course.

As is suppressing women, in any culture.