That would be useful, along with my energy-saving 100% reflective white paint.
-- Joe
That would be useful, along with my energy-saving 100% reflective white paint.
-- Joe
In , J. Larkin wrote in part:
(as in a link to a WOM datasheet)
I found a scan of the datasheet for the Electro-Voice SP13.5TRBXWK
That one also had to be printed on the first day of an April or something like that.
- Don Klipstein ( snipped-for-privacy@misty.com)
Better still...
A slight bit of history:
- Don Klipstein ( snipped-for-privacy@misty.com)
The problem with that chip is that it can handle only weak, low power bits. "10uW/BIT TYPICAL" (per the datasheet)
Low power bits get tired quickly, and shatter easily. If you've ever done any bit banging with them, you'll know that! I believe that's why the chip had very low acceptance by professionals.
Ed
But it is still highly valued by audio professionals [1] because of its 6.3 volt filament power input. It imparts a "tube sound" to the write-only bits.
John
[1] For certain values of "professionals."
Now i have to go double check, i thought mine had a Raytheon logo. Gotta love that V(ff) though.
That data sheet is very different from the one i have. I will post it when i come across it.
Your cheeks and tongue must be much stronger than mine.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required