Articles about the FISA court surveillance warrants appeared in the the New York Times and in the Wall Street Journal, both concerning the Indictment handed down the day before by John Durham, Special Attorney to the Attorney General (William Barr).
It is interesting to compare and contrast the very different approaches taken in the two articles when discussing the exact same thing. The WSJ and the NYT are the largest circulation national daily newspapers in the US (excluding USA Today), and they together pretty much define the poles of media opinion. All documents are mercifully short.
Here are links to the two articles:
NYT: "Ex-F.B.I. Lawyer Expected to Plead Guilty in Review of Russia Inquiry", Adam Goldsmith, NYT, 14 August 2020.
.
WSJ: "Former FBI Lawyer Expected to Plead Guilty to Altering Email on Trump Aide Surveillance", Byron Tau, WSV, 14 August 2020. (May be behind a paywall, but available in major libraries.)
.
DoJ: And here is a link to the actual criminal indictment, which is only four double-spaced pages of text: (Defendant: Kevin Clinesmith, Case1:20-cr-00165-JEB, DC US District Court)
.
Although not made clear in the two articles, with a guilty plea and subsequent felony conviction, Clinesmith will be disbarred, and his legal career will end.
Joe Gwinn