How Astronomers Missed the Massive Asteroid That Just Whizzed Past Earth

You finally got something right! So, why did you and DL bring it up and keep harping about it? You're right, it is silly.

Reply to
Whoey Louie
Loading thread data ...

John Larkin wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

We can pass them through certain mediums and actually slow them down now.

A very important property to make use of.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Whoey Louie wrote in news:67d10cba-8433-4f87- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Admit it, punk. You do weigh more than 280 Lbs.

and not much of that is muscle.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

You mean like plastic and glass, AlwaysWrong?

I have a couple of these marvelous inventions resting on my nose. They certainly are useful, AlwaysWrong.

Reply to
krw

snipped-for-privacy@notreal.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

Not refraction, Williams.

Try looking up slow light.

The thing that moves slow in you is any grasp of any picture, refraction gear assisting or not, much less the big picture.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

No. Much more sophisticated than that altering the group velocity by passing pure monochromatic radiation down a highly dispersive medium B-E condensate configured in such a state that it hampers propagation slowing the speed of a pulse of light down to under 40 mph!

formatting link

It is a non-trivial slow down factor of 2 million.

In this instance he is right and you are wrong.

It was first done at the turn of the century and the physics tricks it uses to work may yet be relevant to optical quantum computing.

--
Regards, 
Martin Brown
Reply to
Martin Brown

Yes, refraction, AlwaysWrong.

Why? Refraction is a better use.

AlwaysWrong is ALWAYS wrong. Amazing.

Reply to
krw

I find lenses to be *far* more useful.

Nope. You're wrong. Obviously!

Who cares? Lenses fit the bill quite well.

Reply to
krw

Stupid, ignorant and determined to stay that way.

--
Regards, 
Martin Brown
Reply to
Martin Brown

Yo clearly can't read, nor think. That's really not surprising, though. At least you're consistent.

Reply to
krw

Krw isn't actually stupid, or particularly ignorant, and his determination to stick to the opinions he has - some of which are remarkably stupid - see ms represent a specific cognitive deficit.

He lacks the capacity to recognise that any of his opinions might be wrong, and thus any possibility of correcting them. He's so confident that his op inions are correct that he thinks that everybody else shares the same opini on, so anybody who disagrees with him on a matter of fact is deliverately l ying. It's bizarre.

He's been like this for years. One has to wonder how his family copes.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.