Hey, screw you, xray! If he did that, where would I get all my material? ;-P
Cheers! Rich
Hey, screw you, xray! If he did that, where would I get all my material? ;-P
Cheers! Rich
Ah-HAH!!! Success at last!!! ;-P ;-P ;-P
Cheers! Rich
0-a could be described by having no money, and even worse, owing money to someone.
sqrt(-a), though, I still have trouble visualizing... and it still amazes me that an infinite sum of sines and cosines could be a solution to a partial differential equation...
Yup. I got some SIASL quotes, and turned my auto quote script loose on them. Unfortunately, they are mostly far too long, and occasionally much too conservative for my current tastes (although I loved them when I was
13), so I've gone back to the math quotes. Next: Origin of Species.
Other people's time and trouble.
Noted. See above.
Stranger in a Strange Land?
Indeed. And that's *more* than enough!
Er, not to my knowledge. You spend virtually all your time inflicting your particular twisted 'weltschauung' on the innocent contributors here. Your OT posting contribution must be the highest of any regular bar none.
It's not electronics you need help with, Bill.
Yes, guilty on this count. I've been a net *giver* on other groups for enough years to qualify for a long-overdue rebate!
Big deal. It was a wholly innocuous pointer to an entirely apposite reference work which eventually went to one of our regulars who was very grateful for it.
You're the one on your high horse, M8. :-/
This say a lot about your knowledge, or lack of it, and nothing about my posting habits. A google groups search threw up 14 entries for me for the last seven days, of which six were technical. Technical answers do take up more time that pointing out that you have an inflated idea of your own competence, and they are usually read by people who are less likely to make foolish responses that invite caustic reactions (though the Jackal is a depressing exception).
Rich Grise might be a competitor. See if you can find an objective measure that might confirm this implausible hypothesis. Your own record over the last week is probably worse than mine, not that I can be bothered to tease out the on-topic to off-topic ratio,
So have you got a job for me?
One wonders what you have been offering your other news groups. Your contributions to sci.econ, alt.uk.law, and uk.legal don't seem to be all that helpful.
Describing a very specialised text-book as a "An absolute "must have" book for all engineers" is deceitful, as is plugging it without acknowledging that you were the seller. If you think that this is "wholly innocuous" your moral sense is as defective as the rest of your intellectual apparatus. It certainly got right up my nose.
Of course II'm on a high horse - I've earned my superior position, and I'm both entitled and obliged to pour scorn on you (as a warning to others).
Message-ID: References:
Kidding Mr. shoeman says ...hey hey ... You never made any kids ... poor ole man. Oh you are that kid who dreams of growing up and becoming black and singing jazz at the nightclubs. Go to sleep.
Just put it on an X-Y plane, where X is the real axis, and Y is the imaginary axis, and each number is a vector. To multiply, you rotate the vector, so for the square root, you rotate the vector half way back. You start with a vector [a,0], and rotate it 180 degrees, that's [-a,0], but when you rotate it back 90 degrees, you get [0,-ai].
That's how they use j in electronics, and the circle is where the sine and cosine come from.
and it still
Yeah, me too. ;-)
Cheers! Rich
Haha! Typical reply from our JT. Jim, I said, "give us *ALL* a break," AND you actually were not shutting-the-f*ck-up 'cause you were posting. For an engineer, you don't follow specifications well. Certainly?
Late reply from me, but in the spirit of reciprocity I went away much longer than a few days myself. Actually, I thought I had made a reasonable request in the real essence of the Christmas season. I realize now that I neglected to say please in my request. Sorry, that was impolite. Thank you, Jim, for taking the time to acknowledge my heartfelt request with your plonkage. If only you had seen fit to acknowledge it with the shut-the-f*ck-upage. Alas. Maybe next Chrismas, if I remember to say please.
Oh well. I didn't think it would work -- obviously it didn't -- but I thought it was worth asking for a reprieve from JT's random stream of consciousness posts for just a brief period during the holidays.
As I said before about the tolerance of our almighty Jim... Plonk plonk plonk plonk plonk plonk plonk plonk plonk plonk plonk plonk plonk plonk plonk ...
Jim, please continue to apply plonks as needed to anything you find upsetting. But continue to post any stray thought that passes through your mind because you know that if you thought it, we all need to hear it.
...
You left out, "Plonk, plonkity, plonk plonk plonk!" (cf. Cartman, SP:BL&U) ...
There seems to be a lot of optimism going around these days - EVERYONE is expecting 2006 to be a better year than 2005 was, but really! How could it _not_?
Cheers! Rich
Its JT's fault! All of his kill filters are slowing everything down. ;-)
Actually i grant strangers a modicum at the start; the amount isn't large and can be pissed away in a literal heartbeat. restarting a zeroed account is kinda difficult.
Paul Burridge isn't a stranger around here, more's the pity.
Well - I do post more off-topic posts than I should, but I do post many more on-topic posts than Paul Burridge does, and I've been doing it for a lot longer.
Pot = Kettle?
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required