High-performance visible-light lasers that fit on a fingertip;
There goes their credibility.
Are you sure it wasn't accelerating? ;-)
It's an error from ScienceDaily. The original article at
Even then, 267 GHz would be 0.267 PHz. So two errors for the price of one!
Using multiplier prefixes in both numerator and denominator is a sin in my eyes, but it *does* translate to a tuning speed of 267 PHz/s, at least they got that right. Other than that, the article is pretty much empty of substance, as usual.
Jeroen Belleman
0.000267 PHz. ;)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
You're right, of course. Where did I put that tera when I needed it?! But I agree about mixing multipliers.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required