"Hiding" is the wrong word. How about "making cameras less of an eyesore"? (I despise having *any* kit visible!)
I'm in the process of updating my "user tracking" system to rely on vision (prototype was RF based but that leaves open a potential attack vector). So, I need to install a boatload of cameras. Most of them *inside* (home, commercial establishments, etc.)
Just mounting them on walls is easy -- but, makes it look like you're in a bank lobby!
I'd thought of down-facing cameras but then I'm limited to tracking motion; "features" would tend to be less visible (unless perhaps using a 360 degree prism? Likely a computational nightmare!). Ideally, I'd like to be able to recognize individual users instead of just "presence detect".
The other issue is that they have to be accessible for service. The easiest way would be to allow service "from the rear" -- another advantage for down-facing (if "the rear" is *attic* space)
I've toyed with some small "spy" cameras with tiny apertures. But, they tend to have a fair bit of bulk *behind* the lens.
I'll skip over illuminator requirements; worry about if that will be an issue *later*!
I just can't see a portion of the solution space that would address all of these issues (neglecting cost). Maybe work strictly in Ir and use some sort of semiopaque lens to disguise its presence? (I wonder how transparent a thin layer of drywall compound would be to Ir?)