Well, in that list of fancy logos:
EPC doesn't make any high enough in voltage, so scratch them off the list.
One actually has datasheets, but no product ("register to learn more!").
Another takes the "we provide, to you, the remarkable opportunity to register, just to maybe view some speculative datasheets!" angle. Yeah, how much you want to bet they don't have squat.
The rest are 'conventional' SiC from known manufacturers (Cree, NXP, etc.), who are shipping real product available at Digikey.
Problem: I searched for MOSFETs in the 600V (or somewhat higher) range, sub 50 miliohms Rds(on) (required to even begin to achieve the necessary conduction losses). SiC dropped out of the list. They don't even make any that beefy. Just plain old boring silicon Super Junction types (so to speak).
So I could go back and find a lower current SiC device and use two in parallel. And waste all the space I hoped to save. Yeah right. It's not like they're available in any fancier packages, TO-247 is TO-247.
If they had said it was 800VDC input, SiC would have better competition. But then, GaN wouldn't even be on the table, not that any products exist anyway.
Now, I am thinking SiC schottky diodes will be important. Ain't no silicon MOSFET that has anywhere near a realistic body diode in that product range.
Tim
--
Seven Transistor Labs
Electrical Engineering Consultation
Website: http://seventransistorlabs.com
wrote in message
news:9d1c0010-5e95-4232-bfef-43bb05013119@googlegroups.com...
On Saturday, July 26, 2014 12:30:27 PM UTC-4, edward....@gmail.com wrote:
> > > https://www.littleboxchallenge.com/
>
>
>
> > "To be eligible to enter the Contest, you must be: ... (2) not a
> > resident of Italy, Brazil, Quebec, Cuba, Iran, Syria, North Korea, or
> > Sudan? (3) not a person or entity under U.S. export controls or
> > sanctions?..."
>
>
>
> And not to far from Google in mountain view and EPRI in palo alto. Must
> be an educational institution to get 30K development grant. So,
> probably Berkeley or Stanford.
That seems like a lot for a 40 in^3 prototype. How pricey are those wide
bandgap FETS anyway?