Gerber Edit & Panelization

Jul 03, 2014 28 Replies

Uh huh. Better check your math.

On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 05:03:06 -0400, JW Gave us:

What are you babbling about? What do you dispute?

The amount of material we destroy or the amount I could make from it?

The first IS based on facts, and the second claim is based on experience with how a schlock house operates and is not pure 'fact' based. It was an estimate.

So what are you having a problem with, Bozo?

If your definition of "several thousand" is eight three thousand or so, dum-dum. But then you are AlwaysWrong...

Maybe your work output is no more valuable than the BOM cost but you would be the only one here.

It's AlwaysWrong - it's not like he's going to be designing anything, he could only sell the raw parts for what they're worth.

Probably true but that has nothing to do with "math".

On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:31:22 -0400, JW Gave us:

You seem to have a problem with making up retarded names for people. F*ck you, asswipe.

A totally retarded f*ck like you wouldn't know.

Again, you obviously have no clue what a schlock house is. Nice job of showing your stupidity yet again.

If you could make millions a year from tens of thousands of dollars worth of parts, why not just do it? The parts cost would be in the noise.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 160 North State Road #203 Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 hobbs at electrooptical dot net http://electrooptical.net

On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 08:02:19 -0400, Phil Hobbs Gave us:

First off "A million plus" is not "millions".

Secondly, if recovering from scrap, the "part cost" is near nil.

Goddamned nit-pick wanna bes and you can't even get that right.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required