Sure. It is rated as such. It should be fast enough as a prescaler for an FPGA. For even faster clockrates, there is the MC12095 doing div_2 and div_4 at 2.5GHz, or the NBGS53 doing div_2 at 10GHz.
Rene
Sure. It is rated as such. It should be fast enough as a prescaler for an FPGA. For even faster clockrates, there is the MC12095 doing div_2 and div_4 at 2.5GHz, or the NBGS53 doing div_2 at 10GHz.
Rene
How good is the signal to noise on your wave?
I assume you plan to start your counter on the positive zero crossing of your wave (or some other point), and stop it on the next positive zero crossing. I can't be bothered to do the maths now, but it wont take much noise to cause a significant error if you are hoping to get better than 0.05% resolution.
Gareth
You could design it to clear the prescaler counter before the counting interval, and then after that, bit-bang out a substitue clock and detect at what count the prescaler overflowed.
Mark Zenier snipped-for-privacy@eskimo.com Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)
There's also the third option of a PLL multiplier at low frequencies.
Recently I looked at using a small Altera MAX3000A series CPLD (I think it was an EPM3064A) for high-speed counting. I fit a fairly wide counter with some fancy enables (to sync with a reference clock) plus a serial shift register (to read the output with a microcontroller) with an Fmax of just over 200MHz.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required