Electronic pressure sensors. gauges

Jan 28, 2020 10 Replies

If I make a pumped probe thing, it needs a pressure gauge. (maybe two) How to do that on the cheap?



For the pumped chamber I'd like a range of ~10-1000 Torr, (But I'm happy for thread drift into other ranges) So I got out "Building Scientific apparatus" Their list of gauges: Mechanical (Bourdon, McLeod) Capacitance manometer. (Star this as good candidate!) Thermo-conductivity gauges TC, Pirani...let me add convectron which is also interesting candidate. Viscous drag (below 1 Torr (10^-1 - 10^-6)) Ionization (again low pressure)



So I built this sorta pirani/ convectron gauge from a thermistor. it was mehhh... sorta ok, but was fussy about zero's. and drifty. (perhaps due thermistor waving around on, held by it's leads.)



But I'd like to talk about a capacitance manometer. There's a plate (of a selected thickness.. different ranges) and two chambers with electrodes on each side. (OK is it just me or does wikipedia stink these days... what happened to all the articles?) OK this looks interesting, but overly complicated.

formatting link
back in the 80's I used a gauge that had a chamber on each side and you set the meter to read the difference.



Later, gotta run George H.


Maybe you could pulse-heat a thermistor or thinfilm RTD or high-TC wire and observe the cool-down curve. Something low emissivity to reduce radiation cooling?

How about a shielded 3-terminal capacitor?

How much does a commercial vacuum gage cost?

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc picosecond timing precision measurement jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com http://www.highlandtechnology.com

We use this one in our SEM cathodoluminescence system to detect when the chamber starts to vent, so that we can turn off the MPPC bias and return to room temperature before water starts to condense on the cold plate. Its range is 10 to 1200 millibars, about $2 in hundreds.

Cheers

Phil

Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com

I copied this thermistor/ bridge 'recipe' from a vacuum guy. it was meh. I tried wrapping a bit of Al foil around it, made no difference AFAICT

Air capacitor? Don't know.

Oh boy...IDK. I'm going to say $500 gauge and meter. but probably cheaper somewhere... a cheap mechanical dial.. maybe $20-50?

OK looks like a mechanical gauge costs ~$10 in one from granger.

George H.

Nice, thanks. I'll give it a whirl. George h.

That's the principle of the thermocouple vacuum gage, and the thermocouple is a better choice than a thermistor, because it's tolerant of higher temperatures, and gives (intrinsically) a differential measurement. It takes an AC regulated current for the classical ones, and readout is just a voltmeter. They aren't expensive to make, but the commercial ones standardized back in the vacuum-tube era on odd connectors and awkward 'standard' specifications.

The capacitance manometer is a nice scheme. With modern electronics setting up an AC-excited Blumlein Bridge - sort of a Wheatstone Bridge, but with a centre-tapped transformer as two of the arms, and the capacitance to the (grounded) stretched metal diaphragm as the other two - is cheap and simple .

Berylium copper shim would have been my choice of diaphragm material back i n about 1965.

The ones I've seen have been expensive. For it's electron microscope chambe rs Cambridge Instrument went with Pirani gauges fro coarse vacuum and ion g auges for high vacuum, but that choice was made way back when capacitance m anometer electronics was a lot more expensive.

A turbo-molecular pum as a vacuum gauge?

You can get surface mount thermistors these days

Baratron was the best known supplier back then.

From my Ph.D. thesis

J.J Opsteleten and N. Warmholtz Applied Science Research Hague B4 page 329 (1955)

J.J Opsteleten, N. Warmholtz and J.J. Zaalberg von Zelst ibid B6 pages 129 (1956)

D.R. Lovejoy Rev. Sci. Instrum 32 page 41 (1961)

The first two were from the Philips research lab and meticulous. The third one was American, and less so.

At the time I was thinking about an electrostatic force balance version of the capacitance manometer. It wouldn't have been any good for pressure diff erences over a few torr, but it was an entertaining idea.

Bill Sloman, Sydney

There was a vogue for using diaphragms etched into a silicon wafer with built-in strain gauges. Motorola and Honeywell both used to sell them fairly cheaply.

Bill Sloman, Sydney

Since you claim to be OK with thread drift, I'll throw in "Crookes Radiometer". They are sensitive to low-range gas pressure, but I have no idea whether there is calibration data somewhere.

Also when I was playing with pumping on liquid helium I needed a silicone oil manometer measuring pressure relative to vacuum in the closed-off arm. But the oil would "stick" to the closed-off end and not measure. I solved by using liquid nitrogen (which we would always have handy if using helium) soaked into cotton waste to temporarily pack around the closed end. That would freeze the oil which cracked and released the stick. My own invention; worked every time!

Mike.

The usual t/c vacuum sensor is a 4-wire device, with separate heater and sensor elements, and works steady-state. Now that we have microprocessors, we could have a simpler 2-wire element that's both the heater and the sensor, probably with pulsed heating.

A thermocouple made of thin wire could be the heater and the sensor.

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc picosecond timing precision measurement jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com http://www.highlandtechnology.com

ng up an AC-excited Blumlein Bridge - sort of a Wheatstone Bridge, but with a centre-tapped transformer as two of the arms, and the capacitance to th e (grounded) stretched metal diaphragm as the other two - is cheap and simp le.

in about 1965.

bers Cambridge Instrument went with Pirani gauges fro coarse vacuum and ion gauges for high vacuum, but that choice was made way back when capacitance manometer electronics was a lot more expensive.

Yeah! According to 'Building Scientific Apparatus' they spin a magnetically suspended steel ball up to 415 Hz, and then measure how long it takes to slow dow to 405 Hz... (several minutes at the low pressure range.) A spendy bit of kit!

(Hey Bill thanks for the nice response.)

George H.

9 (1955)
9 (1956)

d one was American, and less so.

f the capacitance manometer. It wouldn't have been any good for pressure di fferences over a few torr, but it was an entertaining idea.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required