Electronic components aging

That's true but these components will also prevent others from failing. That isn't what the reliability numbers show, however.

The numbers are silly and they way they're normally used is even worse. It's the old "be careful what you ask for because you're likely to get it".

Reply to
krw
Loading thread data ...

I find it very hard to believe that input protection networks increase the field return rate.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

Hey, those current limiters on power output stages and those overtemperature shutdown circuits increase the FIT rates!

--

John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc 
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com    

Precision electronic instrumentation 
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators 
Custom timing and laser controllers 
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links 
VME  analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer 
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
Reply to
John Larkin

ones

with

involves

rebuilding

Unfortunately not so. The relevant manager has her/his eye altogether too closely on the quarterly figures that determine his/her bonus to do that. That preempts the preventative maintenance.

And it might have been the result of a PUC or Court order, both rather non-negotioable. It is amazing how the CA PUC suddenly developed some teeth after the San Bruno disaster.

Reply to
josephkk

reasons,

That's not all; the new memory wasn't any faster or that much lower power. A long time a go (~ 40 years) i worked on computer that used core with

120 ns access time and 300 ns cycle time, faster than DRAM nearly 20 years later.
Reply to
josephkk

Which still hasn't changed much; RAS/CAS cycle times are around, erm, I see figures around 10ns. Quite a bit less in absolute terms, but with CPU clock rates over a thousand times higher, it simply hasn't scaled accordingly. I/O is even worse; one figure puts PCIe latency on the order of a microsecond (I forget if that's fractional or multiple us?), absolutely no different from the old ISA bus (8MHz, though only 8 bit).

Tim

--
Seven Transistor Labs 
Electrical Engineering Consultation 
Website: http://seventransistorlabs.com
Reply to
Tim Williams

product

weak

see,

awareness

then,

trusts

will

they

overtemperature

This discussion reminds me of a bit of conversation i once overheard. The discussion was about some new (back then) high energy density metallized film capacitors. The goal energy density was something like 20 mF*V per in^3 at 400 V. The manufacturer could make them with a lifetime of 200 to

300 hours. The operational goal was 168 hours. The problem arose when the customer insisted on 168 hour burn-in on 100% of the parts. After burn-in they could no longer meet operational goals due to the limited life. IIRC the infant mortality period was something like 2 hours at 120 % rated voltage. Never did hear how it all worked out though.

?-)

Reply to
josephkk

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.