Design problem

Take this first circuit that works decently to 204C: Version 4 SHEET 1 1012 680 WIRE 672 -128 224 -128 WIRE 224 -80 224 -128 WIRE 672 -80 672 -128 WIRE 16 16 16 -32 WIRE 16 16 -48 16 WIRE 224 16 224 0 WIRE 224 16 16 16 WIRE 672 80 672 0 WIRE 16 112 16 16 WIRE 224 208 224 16 WIRE 16 256 16 192 WIRE 48 256 16 256 WIRE 160 256 128 256 WIRE -48 320 -48 16 WIRE 16 320 16 256 WIRE 224 448 224 304 WIRE -416 464 -480 464 WIRE -304 464 -336 464 WIRE -160 464 -304 464 WIRE -48 464 -48 384 WIRE -48 464 -80 464 WIRE 16 480 16 400 WIRE -304 496 -304 464 WIRE -48 528 -48 464 WIRE -304 608 -304 576 WIRE -304 608 -480 608 WIRE 16 608 16 576 WIRE 16 608 -304 608 WIRE 224 608 224 528 WIRE 224 608 16 608 WIRE 16 656 16 608 FLAG 672 80 0 FLAG 16 656 0 FLAG 16 -32 out SYMBOL npn 160 208 R0 SYMATTR InstName Q2 SYMATTR Value 2N3904 SYMBOL res 208 432 R0 SYMATTR InstName R4 SYMATTR Value 0.001 SYMBOL res 0 96 R0 SYMATTR InstName R2 SYMATTR Value 88K SYMBOL res -64 448 R90 WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 0 WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 0 SYMATTR InstName R3 SYMATTR Value 3.0K SYMBOL res 208 -96 R0 SYMATTR InstName R1 SYMATTR Value 6.8K SYMBOL voltage 672 -96 R0 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName Vline SYMATTR Value 120V SYMBOL res -320 480 R0 WINDOW 0 42 31 Left 0 WINDOW 3 35 80 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName R8 SYMATTR Value 1.0 SYMBOL res -320 448 R90 WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 0 WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 0 SYMATTR InstName R9 SYMATTR Value 1.0K SYMBOL pnp -48 576 M180 SYMATTR InstName Q1 SYMATTR Value 2N2907 SYMBOL cap -64 320 R0 WINDOW 3 -59 -3 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName C1 SYMATTR Value 0.001µ SYMBOL res 144 240 R90 WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 0 WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 0 SYMATTR InstName R5 SYMATTR Value 0.001 SYMBOL res 0 304 R0 SYMATTR InstName R6 SYMATTR Value 100 TEXT -480 384 Left 0 !V1 N005 0 AC 1 SIN(0 0.001 10KHZ) TEXT 472 464 Left 0 !.ac oct 5 0.01Hz 10Khz TEXT -480 496 Left 0 ;N005 TEXT 240 32 Left 0 ;Vc=50V TEXT 304 -48 Left 0 ;Ic=10.3mA TEXT 80 136 Left 0 ;I=559uA TEXT 64 312 Left 0 ;Ib=25.5uA TEXT -256 440 Left 0 ;-60dB TEXT 80 40 Left 0 ;-7.7dB TEXT 24 432 Left 0 ;Ie=534uA TEXT -136 552 Left 0 ;Ib=2.45uA TEXT 240 416 Left 0 ;I=9.76mA TEXT -320 256 Left 0 !.TEMP 0 204

** END ** This is fine and dandy, except that Q2 can get hot under the collar at 50V and 10mA; certainly cannot withstand in practice, the 204C and the temp rise at that power. So..my idea was to cascode Q2 by putting a 2N3055 or equivalent (Q3) above it with Q3 base at 6.2V via a zener, giving an approx max Q2 dissipation of 55mW - which may be high at 204C but a LOT better. So, at 27C, R2=77.5K and the output level is -8.7dB; slightly lower but very acceptable. BUT..run the temp to a mere 160C and we are seeing trouble coming to River City without the music man as Vc drops to about 15V. Suggestions for a fix, anyone?
Reply to
Robert Baer
Loading thread data ...

r
3)

wer

to

The 2N3055 has a lot more silicon area the the 2N3904. Are you sure that your 6k8 at R1 isn't being dragged down the collector leakage current? The first data sheet I could download for the 2N3055 had Iceo at up to 5mA at 150C, which is enough to drag Vc down to 15V.

The Motorola 2N3055 was notorious for being a smaller (and faster) device than RCA's origininal 2N3055, and migh have less leakage current.

-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

Reply to
Bill Sloman

"Bill Sloman"

The Motorola 2N3055 was notorious for being a smaller (and faster) device than RCA's origininal 2N3055,

** The Aluminium pack Motorola 2N3055 dates from the early/mid 1970s and utilised a surprisingly small chip compared to others - about 1/4 the area. The base and emitter connections were made with fusible Al wire instead of pointy shaped steel strips like most brands.

But Motorola are very naughty and like to substitute chips in legacy devices at whim - for example, the chips used in Motorola or " ON " 2N3773s and MJ802s have long ( since the mid 1980s) been identical to the ones in their MJ15003s.

God knows what chip is actually inside a current stock " ON " 2N3055G.

Whatever is most convenient and cheapest for them to use, no doubt.

... Phil

Reply to
Phil Allison

r
3)

wer

to

That's a really odd looking circuit, what's it supposed to do?

Reply to
Fred Bloggs

This circuit assumes the Vbe's of the transistors will cancel. That may not work very well in real life. Self-heating of Q2 looks like a thermal runaway hazard to me. Cascoding would help that, but the Vbe match is still a hazard.

Can Spice account for self-heating of transistors, and the subsequent change in Vbe? It would have to know the heatsinking situation if it did.

What's the intent/application? Do you need DC coupling?

John

Reply to
John Larkin

Are you looking for som,ething that works when a semiconductor's junction temperature hits 204 degrees C? Or in an ambient temperature of

204 degrees C? 204 degrees C appears to me awfully hot for silicon. My experience with datasheets for silicon transistors in metal packages is that absolute maximum junction temperature is 200 C.

Furthermore: Once or twice back around 1980 or in the early 1980's I saw figures for life expectancy or MTBF for such devices as a function of temperature. I remember the numbers not looking good (MTBF under around

10K hours or something like that?) when junction temperature gets past 175 C.
--
 - Don Klipstein (don@donklipstein.com)
Reply to
Don Klipstein

Can you add more Q2's (with emitter R's) in parallel?

Don't know if it'll work at 204C, but at least it will spread the dissipation across multiple transistors.

Ed

Reply to
ehsjr

Well, i used 2N3055 because it was the only power NPN that Spice had..there are "equivalents" like the MJD50, the TIP50, the STLD128DN etc.

Reply to
Robert Baer

It is for what the oil patch calls a Casing Collar Locater (CCL). Made with 2 very strong Alnico magnets opposing and a coil in between. When assembly passes a pipe collar, the magnetic field gets "bent" some and nominally generates a 1mV pulse; (say) first positive then negative; roughly 1mSec at nominal tool speed. The idea here is to get more gain than that obtained by the SIE circuit, as well as have a more uniform gain over temperature.

Reply to
Robert Baer

Please see my response to Fred Bloggs on application. Yes, DC coupling is a virtual necessity - but the sensing coil could be AC coupled to the amplifier; presumedly there is a CCL amplifier (Titan Industries,i believe) using a FET and the coil had to be capacitively coupled so as to not ruin the FET biasing. Now i started with Q2 being a 2N3055 equivalent (TIP-50) and R4 about

8 ohms (forget value of R2) and that worked over temperature after a fashion. As you mentioned, there was a Vbe "matching" problem especially as the whole beastie got heated by the environment. Seems Spice does not do self-heating effects. But it does something strange; i tried zeners in series with Q2 collector to decrease power dissipation of Q2. But...Spice makes zeners "die" in the 180C region; shorted above - transition dependent on voltage choice. Not too reliable with zeners..
Reply to
Robert Baer

Plastic / epoxy package; SMT and 204C ambient (note: all of the "wrong" answers). If one does a design on that basis, it usually works well to 185C. I have a few isolated designs that are reliable all the way up, but the dizzy-pay-shun is under 1mW.

Reply to
Robert Baer

That is a good thought, but (say) if 10 were used, that would mean 10 times the base current, making R2 crudely speaking 10 times lower and killing the overall gain by that factor. Cascode Q2 or zener-in-series would seem a better choice. See attached.

Reply to
Robert Baer

r
3)

wer

to

Leakage across reverse biased Si junctions doubles for every 10oC rise in temperature- so that is about a factor of 10^6 increased leakage over room temperature spec, or 1mA at 200oC for every 1nA of room temp ICBO, also the HFE should be about double the room temp gain.

Reply to
Fred Bloggs

That doesn't sound like it needs DC coupling.

I've experimented with mosfets over temperature. They work up to maybe

300C, but the gate threshold keeps going down as temp goes up. The ones I tested failed at maybe 330C... maybe the die attach solder melted or something.

I'd guess that some commercial opamps might work pretty hot. Maybe ask various applications engineers at the semi companies. I have a connection to someone who designs high-temp downhole electronics... I'll ask her.

Uniform gain implies lots of open-loop gain and feedback.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

llar

(Q3)

lower

ng to

.

That doesn't absolve you from thinking about the way leakage currents increase exponentially with temperature. Your reply to John Larkin suggests that the reverse leakage current in your zener diode might have been the real problem - get the zener hot enough and you don't need to activate any kind of breakdown mechanism to sink the current from the resistor in series, so the voltage across the zener diode can sink to close to zero.

-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

Reply to
Bill Sloman

collar

d

nt (Q3)

ly lower

ming to

o

tc.

There is such a thing as high temp linear

formatting link

Reply to
Fred Bloggs

llar

(Q3)

lower

ng to

een.

ed text -

formatting link

Reply to
Fred Bloggs

I'd worry about the zeners at that temperature. Mind you I say "worry" because I do not know. But I suspect they will bring you grief.

Ed

Reply to
ehsjr

Along these lines, Motorola did a die shrink on us in the 1990's on some power FETs... We found out the hard way they weren't as good as they had been in the past in our inverters. They quickly lost a pretty good customer at that time.

I am curious is the ON Semi MJ15024 TO-3 power NPNs are as good as they used to be. Those have been the replacement NPN of choice for most audio power amplifiers I have worked on.

boB

Reply to
boB

** The MJ15024 first appeared in the late 1970s and has gone though several changes of chip since then.

That last change I am aware of was in the mid 1990s after plastic pack versions of the same device were released ( ie MJL21194). Because lead frames are used, plastic power devices cannot normally use the exact same chip design as a TO3 version. The TO3 chips had used two termination areas for the emitter structures as opposed to one for plastic versions.

AFAIK, all the changes are in fact performance upgrades of the earlier versions - particularly in terms of SOA.

The only major hassle is for repairers of older amplifiers - as the various versions have somewhat different Vbe characteristics and may not share current well installed in parallel groups.

..... Phil

Reply to
Phil Allison

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.