It doesn't help, but the effect is almost always transistory - as I said (and you've snipped) ecological concerns can be addressed and dealt with, as opposed the effects of unrestricted free trade.
No company I've ever worked with has ever had exactly same sales figures from one month to the next - competition and consumer fads are ever-present problems.
Indeed. You've just made it clear that your grasp of economics doesn't go past repeating what you read in the right wing press.
I've snipped the childish slogans that you pilfered from that source.
If you want to find out how modern socialism works, look at the European Union, and note that their currency - the euro - now buys $1.46174. When you finally get around to electing a Democratic president and a congress which isn't dominated by congressmen who share your mindless faith in the free market, you can reliably expect to do better. The rather more pragmatic European approach looks at the way the world actually works, rather than insisting that the unrestricted free market always leads to the best of all possible worlds, a delusion which gave you Enron, amongst other triumphs of free-market non-thinking.
It's characteristic of your kind of nit-wit to describe socialist taxation - to be spent on effective social security and health care - as theft, while your own tax system pays more out to your "defence" industries than is spent in aggregate by the next ten countries down the pecking order. and your internal free market in energy allowed Enron to rip off the consumers big time. If the guys who profit from the defects in your system are capitalists, their depredations aren't theft?
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen