The following is the text of a fault report I have just typed up for a batch of H8/323 chips that have come in but don't work at all:
The devices do not program as a standard HD6473238F10, using a Data I/O
>Chiplab-48 programmer. The device comes up as invalid - much as would
>happen if there was nothing in the socket.
>
>The devices are also the wrong size; the lead frame is about 0.5mm larger
>than the Hitachi spec and it jams in our ZIF socket, which is an expensive
>programming adapter made in the USA and recommended by Data I/O.
>
>The marking is weird. On the one hand they are marked "HD6473238F10" (which
>is the correct part number) but then they are also marked "H8/223" (which
>as far as I can tell is a part that has never existed, from Hitachi or
>anybody else).
>
>The supplied photograph showing the device in question, next to a real
>H8/323, shows the subtle differences.
>
>The following are nor problems as such but may be useful information:
>
>The overall packaging is different to Hitachi. It comes on 70-device
>trays whereas Hitachi have always (since we started using these in 1994)
>used 50-device trays. The labelling style is completely different from
>anything we have ever seen from Hitachi on this part. The date code on the
>chip itself, 8K1, is not one we have seen before but is not implausible.
>
>My opinion is that these chips are counterfeit; a most bizzare possibility
>since it would be immediately discovered by anybody actually using them.
>The "H8/223" marking is a dead give-away of a non-Hitachi part; it's rather
>like printing $100 bills with $110 on them. We didn't break any to see if
>there is silicon inside.
What amazes me is that it would be worth somebody's while to manufacture bogus devices. This was a 3000 piece batch. This is quite an unusual part, discontinued around 2001 by Hitachi and circulating fairly freely on the "we can get you discontinued parts" second tier distributor circuit in the USA and elsewhere.
Many years ago I did some ASIC design and one could get those kinds of quantities made, just about, but this kind of thing suggests a well geared up operation (I don't know the source but most likely in the Far East) which tries to make a fast buck, then fold up (because the con will be immediately discovered) and start under another name.