Coin machine - comestero

Jun 09, 2014 10 Replies

Hi to all.



Am planning to implement one pulse coin machine ( comestero ) into one existing HW that was used for some other purpose.



What i have:



12V / GND / one data line and i can pull one additional line from MCU.

Question:



- would it be possible to use just one line for reading all coin values ( 0,5 / 1 / 2 / 5 )



Regards !


give encoded output or pulse output. The pulse output gives one pulse per base amount, so a 2 coin will generate 4 pulses (if base is 0,5).

Saludos

Model: rm5 evolution But did you use one wire to read the coins or more wires ?

As far as i know reading data from one pin should be enough to read all possible combinations. Like 0.5 / 1 / 2 or 5. Basically all i need is one wire to MCU that would read input coins.

I used 1 wire for communication and two for power, and the validator was configured for pulse output. The multipulse mode is compatible with mechanical validators, so you can upgrade a machine easily.

It seems that the RM5 X 0M works this way, but I'm not 100% sure. The models I used (from NRI and Azkoyen) gave one 100 ms low pulse per coin unit.

Newer validators (including RM5 X CC) can use ccTalk, a 1-wire serial communication protocol.

Saludos

That depends on which "rm5 evolution" model you have.

umop apisdn --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

formatting link

I used 1 wire for communication and two for power, and the validator was configured for pulse output. The multipulse mode is compatible with mechanical validators, so you can upgrade a machine easily.

*** That's what i was thinking of. 12V, GND , 1 data wire.

CCTALK i have used cctalk on few boards but it's not that reliable. It has more options regarding tracking informations but for normal projects, pulse code is ok. What MCU are u using ?

I used Freescale and Fujitsu, but any MCU should do.

Saludos

You can use webmaster at solener dot com.

Saludos

there's several different options for the electronics, some of them will work with a single data wire.

CCTALK works fine if you have a real UART, or a good software UART. The protocol provides ample scope for error detection and recovery. I've only used it on validators that had built-in USB-SERIAL (SiLabs CP2101 IIRC)

umop apisdn --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

yep, real uart is the word :-) On side of this, cctalk is quite good.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required