CD4050AE vs CD4050BE

I have a project that requires a 4050. I bought around 50 CD4050BE ICs, but none of them work in place of the old (vintage 1975) CD4050AE.

I lifted legs 2 and 3 out of the IC socket, attached my scope to leg 2 and connected leg 3 to leg 1. This should have caused pin 2 to go high according to the data sheet. The input threshold for high is supposed to be 3.5v. Pin 8 is a good hard ground. The voltage supply is 5.02v. The CD4050BE (new ones) were pulling the inputs down from

4.5-5v down to 2.5v (there is a 47ohm resistor in front of the inputs). With the CD4050AE part the inputs are not pulled down.

So either I got an entire tube of bad parts, or the AE / BE indicates something important? I haven't been able to find a data sheet specifically for the CD4050AE.

I have tested a vintage 1975 MC14050CP is known to work in place of the CD4050AE for this application.

I will continue to try to find the data sheet.

Right now I am going crazy. I have tried 8 or so parts from the tube. I wouldn't imagine the whole tube would be bad. Even in a test circuit I can't get anything out of them... : ( Even if the voltage was not high enough to be "high", it was sure loading the inputs a lot...

Thanks, Grant

Reply to
logjam
Loading thread data ...

Download the CD4050A datasheet from

formatting link

--
Dave M
MasonDG44 at comcast dot net  (Just substitute the appropriate characters in the 
address)

Life is like a roll of toilet paper; the closer to the end, the faster it goes.
Reply to
DaveM

Unicorn Electronics. I have never had a problem with anything from there before... I can't help but think that there might be a difference between the AE and BE suffix???

If the device were damaged by static, is it possible that the inputs would have more load?

Grant

Reply to
logjam

The 4xxxB family has a has added input diodes for ESD protection. There may be more differences, but I'm not sure.

I never had any trouble with the B family, but the A parts I used to get from Radio Shack had a high failure rate. This, however, was a LONG time ago.

Bob

Reply to
Bob

Where did you buy these parts?

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

--
"it\'s the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

If I remember correctly, the A series had a max. voltage of 10 whereas the B series has a max. voltage of 20. The high and low logic levels are 90% or

18V when supplied by 20V and 10% or 2 volts for the B series. The high and low levels for 10 volts series are 9 and 1, respectively. So a logic high would have to be 9 volts or above or for a logic low 1 volt or below. The higher values provide more noise immunity. At least that was the thought. I'm not sure the B series would work well with a supply voltage of 5V. As this is all from memory, take it with a bit of salt.

I think I have some old databooks lying around and will take a look.

Al

Reply to
Al

There should be virtually no current going into or out of the inputs for applied voltages of 0..12V, even with the Vcc open or shorted to Vss. Either they are entirely fried, your pin numbers are wrong, or they are actually a different kind of part.

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

--
"it\'s the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

My memory is that the 4000 series cmos had a voltage range from 3 to 18 from the getgo. If I'm not mistaken, the B suffix were buffered and had a hard time being forced into such things as analog amplifiers and oscillators.

The guaranteed OUTput of the 4000 series is (as a percentage of Vdd) 90% high and 10% low, while the INput had guaranteed switching rates of 70% and

30% respectively. You always had a guaranteed noise margin of 20%, 3.6 volts at 18 volts Vdd and 1 volt at 5 volts Vdd.

Jim

7

Reply to
RST Engineering (jw)

18 from

hard

oscillators.

90%
70% and
3.6

My recollections are similar. I know that there were definite areas where buffered CMOS could not be interchanged for unbuffered devices.

This TI document refers to this fact in the background paragraph.

formatting link

While this doc specifies unbuffered devices as being marked UB I think this only applied well after the introduction of the buffered series. Initially, only the RCA 4000 (unbuffered) series existed and I think they may have begun to use the A suffix to differentiate from the B series when the latter started to appear more commonly. My old RCA literature may have some further info.

Reply to
Ross Herbert

In article , logjam wrote: [snip]

There is little difference except that the -B version has a higher supply and input voltage range.

The 4050 does have a weakness on the inputs. It is designed to operate with a logic 1 that can exceed the Vcc, up to 20V for the 4050B. In order to do this there is little or no protection against a positive input overvoltage.

Your apparent high current taken by the inputs does suggest damaged parts.

--
Tony Williams.
Reply to
Tony Williams

My old RCA CMOS databook has both data sheets; the main difference is that the 'B' is good for 3-18V power, and the 'A' is good for 3-12V power. Input limits are 20V for 'B' and 12V for 'A'. Both are intended to be driven from higher voltage than the power supply.

(+) power is on pin 1, (-) power is on pin 8.

Other differences are minor (guaranteed sink current at 5V is 3.2 mA for the 'B' and 3 mA for 'A').

Reply to
whit3rd

Are you sure you got real CD4050BE's? Motorola had a part line with numbers beginning like 40xx but they were Motorola's own version of TTL and had nothing to do with the similar CD-series CMOS parts.

It's hard to imagine them being counterfeit parts - it'd be like counterfeiting pennies! - but on the surplus market large batches of mislabeled or just plain defective parts show up quite regularly. The older the chips, or the lower in the distribution chain you go, the more likely what you got were factory rejects or floor sweepings. Are you sure you didn't get these through a time warp from Poly Paks?

Tim.

Reply to
Tim Shoppa

Ahah! Now I remember, the MC4050 was a decade counter and maybe a display decoder used in lots of 70's/80's vintage frequency counters. It won't work nothin like a CD4050.

Tim.

Reply to
Tim Shoppa

But the OP specifically said "CD4050BE", which is nothin' like "MC4050". But maybe the parts are marked differently from what s/he thinks they are.

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

--
"it\'s the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

Precisely.

Jim

-- There are only 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who count in binary and those who don't

Reply to
RST Engineering (jw)

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.