Build your own Over Unity Motor

messagenews: snipped-for-privacy@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

Of course, it's the least he should get as he'll never actually make any money out of it as it's all now in the public domain without having acquired any prior protection!

Do you really not know?

Here's how to reveal the trick - when the first screen shows up, write down the face values of each card. Click the button, and see how many of the cards on your list are still there.

Uh, you _do_ know how to read and write, right? ;-)

Good Luck! Rich

Why? Are you incompetent to count them?

Thanks, Rich

Any of you who have a college education in electronics, shouldn't always take everything at face value. The whole point of the math puzzle is simple. There can be thousands upon thousands of ways, that things can add up to be all the same. Often we search for patterns where there are none, like in resolving pi, and irrational numbers. Most of the constants that you rely on in electronics are based upon irrational numbers and numbers that retain no real pattern. This prevents things from always adding up in a predictable fashion, both in equation and real world circuits. Some people are into fractals and chaos, and I've built circuits that utilize nothing but parallel tuned circuits to prove that predictability can lead to unpredictability in a working circuit. There was no real explaination for how or why the output signal was noise when it should have been modulated. Chaos is not resolved by harmonics, but I did it as a proff once upon a time for a mathematician who's primary interest was chaos and fractals.

Just like the same motor using a different schematic could operate.

And I thought after being quiet for so long he'd gone away and actually built the over unity motor!

I just finished building a K9A2 Platinum Motherboard, AMD Phenome 64 bit Quad Core, 4Gig RAM, multi-card reader, video capture card, video card, 1Gig of Ram and DirectX 10.1, SATA Hard Drive, with a Creative Labs Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Fatality Platinum Sound Card, and it works. All I have left to buy is the speakers for the 7.1 surround sound.

I don't have a motor case, and I will be looking into magnetic simulation software soon. All of it will work, it's just that either you have no experience or education in the field, or are not applying and assuming that you will be proven right in the end without working out a single equation relying on a guy who wrote what is considered a law of thermodynamics, that really doesn't have more to support it than the Big Bang, or what really happens at the bottom of black hole.

Bottom line, Thermodynamics wasn't anything until they started building nuclear power plants. The guy who first said that about entropy, heat and thermodynamics was literally getting to and from work in a carriage pulled by a horse. At that point, every form of technology, every improvement in lubricant, every advancement in ball bearings, magnetic bearings, etc had not even been considered in all of that. To test that is to build everything that could be built, test everything that hasn't been done that could be, and literally, knowing what happened at the moment of the big bang, what happens at the bottom of a black hole where light cannot escape is really exactly the same as the law of thermaldynamics you lean upon to call yourself right without reading the material, considering it's detail, understanding what it applies too, how it works and would based upon is provided. So, there you are predicting the future not knowing everything about everything, when you would have to know that much about everything to call that a law of thermodynamics. The inability to dissapprove it, does not justify labeling it a law of physics because, everything that will be invented has not been invented, and in order to clearly define that every piece of technology that exists today, and everything that has to be developed tomorrow and doesn't exist now today, has to exist now today to prove or disprove that one man's statement.

When are you going to stop talking about it and actually build and run the Over Unity Motor? You could have bult it in less time than you spent building the PC described above.

Less talk, more action, please.

Re-read the subject line: you're supposed to build YOUR OWN over- unity motor. He ain't buildin' nuthin.

Besides, he's already got one...and it's verrry nice.

SED: "Well, um, can we come up and have a look?"

FCG: "Of course not! You are English types-a!"

SED: "Well, what are you then?"

FCG: "I'm French! Why do think I have this outrageous accent, you silly king!"

Cheers, James Arthur

If he would just harness all that hot air he blows, he could run a small village.

FCG: "I now fart in your general direction, you silly English person, you."

No that won't be any good because the simulation software is based on flawed thinking rather than your more advanced and open minded approach to the problem.

I think you will need to design your own simulation software as a first important task, this will ensure that you get the correct answer according to your understanding and therefore be able to prove that the theory is sound.

Are you trying to tell me that coconuts migrate?

Do not the swallows fly south in the winter?

Cheers, James Arthur

elgersmad,

You can also use a pencil and paper to prove your basic ideas.

This newsgroup or any other place you like could read it and will show you how to improve it.

You special computer and custom software will only slow down the real work.

donald

Thank you for explaining yourself so clearly. I will reduce it to a much more quickly communicated form:

You post like you think you are the ultimate zero theory mechanic. You appear to postulate that no one can know if something will work until it has been built. You seem to have zero respect for those who do know enough theory to say "it may be impossible (or economically unjustifiable) to build". You seem to pronounce no value in theory. And seem to categorically reject the fundamental concepts and processes of scientific method.

If any of this is inaccurate please explain precisely how, in light of your post that i am responding to.

I swear i put you ion the cc: list when i forwarded the memo. ));-D

I do what I want, when I want, and my priorities do not fall into your wishes for what I would do with my time. Simulations come first, then the money will be spent on materials. The computer is required to do that work of simulation quickly and effectively. My car is more important to get me to and from work etc. than doing anything you want, my bills are more important than anything you wish I would do. I would rather have simplified assuming intellegent enough to know that I am human by saying, "FUCK OFF!"