The STK500 is solid. Only cons are it can't do ICE and a few of the newer chips aren't supported directly at the sockets, but a) it will still ISP program them over a wire to a breadboard and b) you can get adaptor sockets to make them fit the STK500 directly - it's only a pin mapping issue, not a software one.
Tim Watts
Managers, politicians and environmentalists: Nature's carbon buffer.
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
-------------------------------- 24 Hz from divide by 5
k indicator?
irection in series?
neural net (brain).
meras and post processing...
s temperature.
d any ways,
@ Jan
I have the schematic taken from your drawing with the corrections that you indicate. I cannot read the ascii drawings my newsgroup reader does not use a fixed width font, so they are mangled on this end. Here is a link to my copy of your schematic. I am missing a couple of component values.
-------------------------------- 24 Hz from divide by 5
k indicator?
irection in series?
neural net (brain).
meras and post processing...
s temperature.
d any ways,
@ Jan
I have the schematic taken from your drawing with the corrections that you indicate. I cannot read the ascii drawings my newsgroup reader does not use a fixed width font, so they are mangled on this end. Here is a link to my copy of your schematic. I am missing a couple of component values.
---------------------------------- 24 Hz from divide by 5
us
ock indicator?
t
direction in series?
y neural net (brain).
cameras and post processing...
e
sus temperature.
ood any ways,
I am not sure how exactly that would work, but just some common senses. Take for example, your 2M resistor and 200uF capacitor will have a time constant of the order 400 seconds. How would that affect your 24Hz PLL?
J
Jan Panteltje
On a sunny day (Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:07:40 -0800 (PST)) it happened Chris wrote in :
Please select an fixed spaced font.
J
Jan Panteltje
On a sunny day (Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:19:07 -0800 (PST)) it happened linnix wrote in :
FYI the 200 uF is charged discharged via 10k and the 4016 In my final diagram the bottom of the caps is at 1/2 V so it does not have a start up delay.
L
linnix
ris
ict=3D
a p=3D
tiv=3D
60=3D
wit=3D
k t=3D
er =3D
=3D
=3D
=3D
=A0|=3D
=A0 =3D
=A0 =3D
=A0 =3D
---=3D
=A0=3D
=A0=3D
=A0=3D
=A0=3D
e v=3D
, t=3D
hen=3D
e t=3D
=A0 =3D
-- =3D
=A0 =3D
|
=A0 =3D
| p=3D
=A0 =3D
=3D
=3D
=3D
=A0 =3D
=A0 =3D
=3D
=3D
=3D
e b=3D
rt,=3D
pa=3D
es =3D
req=3D
=A0=3D
=3D
=3D
=A0=3D
=3D
=A0=3D
---=3D
cio=3D
nt
n
ow
t
w
t
s l=3D
bu=3D
ite=3D
g m=3D
al =3D
vid=3D
ver=3D
y g=3D
all
are
to
of
So, time constant of 2 seconds or 4% changes in 24Hz. 200uF is big physically and electrically. They usually comes in 10% values, not sure how stable they are.
J
Jan Panteltje
On a sunny day (Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:03:25 -0800 (PST)) it happened linnix wrote in :
Will only get faster then :-)
C
Chris
These are small:
formatting link
-ND
But Holy crap $150
Chris
J
Jan Panteltje
On a sunny day (Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:17:47 -0800 (PST)) it happened Chris wrote in :
I do not think they are small, they are 100V, what gave you that idea?
BTW, you were talking about 50 mS one shot? The pulse must be *much* shorter then a 24 Hz period, I think max 10 mS here. And it must only happen on the falling or rising egde of the switch (open or close or whatever), and not on both. See the wave forms and diagram I posted earlier.
In my view my circuit is not very sensitive to bounce as far as frequency is concerned, the original circuit without 555 timer would do. Perhaps add a small 10 Ohm resistor in series with the camera switch, to limit contact burn in.
C
Chris
nix
..
ere.
My debounce design gives a 50% duty cycle. That would be 20ms long pulse. So your design requires a short pulse over the period? It comes out of the camera as a 5ms pulse. Again, I am not sure if there is bounce present. All I know is that the multivibrator worked, but the camera switch did not lock on the right frequency. The loop was locking too high. I was using comparitor II.
Regards, Chris Maness
C
Chris
s
:
innix
ig
ot
-...
here.
cy
My parts came today. I tried my design, and it locks solid on the right frequency finally. The new loop filter is awesome. Kudos to Helmut for his damped loop filter. Also, my NE555 debounce circuit fixed the frequency error problem. Yaaaah!
@Jan I will be trying your design next and see how it compares to mine in lock time.
Thanks All Chris Maness
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.