Again with flux removal

May 25, 2017 48 Replies

Your arguments are irrelevant.

The fact that it is not "considered" a carcinogen does not mean it doesn't cause cancer. It only means it has not been demonstrated unequivocally. I would point you to information about the carcinogenicity of these compounds, but it is clear that there is no point.

Enjoy the day.

Rick C

OK, I rest my case. There is no point indeed.

****************************************************************** * KSI@home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. * * Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. * ******************************************************************

On a sunny day (Sat, 27 May 2017 01:06:37 -0400) it happened rickman wrote in :

Huh, recent research found that most people who died of cancer were exposed to bread in their lives. A clear link between cancer and consuming bread in quantity has been demonstrated. As of today .. no more bread.

Beware of abuse of statistics.

Jan Panteltje wrote on 5/27/2017 4:17 AM:

Exactly which statistics do you feel have been abused?

Rick C

On a sunny day (Sat, 27 May 2017 04:37:34 -0400) it happened rickman wrote in :

Most commonly babbled about is glowballworming.

Jan Panteltje wrote on 5/27/2017 6:33 AM:

What does that have to do with the conversation?

Rick C

On a sunny day (Sat, 27 May 2017 11:51:45 -0400) it happened rickman wrote in :

What conversation? tell you what, 1000 Euro and I wil say you are right,

1999 Euro and I will say it twice, great discount 4 u!

Jan Panteltje wrote on 5/27/2017 11:59 AM:

Enjoy your weekend.

Rick C

On a sunny day (Sat, 27 May 2017 12:13:16 -0400) it happened rickman wrote in :

Thank you.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required