Hi,
I'm setting up some electronics capability at my new job, and wouldn't mind avoiding the hefty price tags associated with OrCad and PADS, esp as we don't look to be doing much board development. The work will be mostly low-frequency analog, and I don't anticipate ever needing an auto-router.
I've read favorable comments about both Easy-PC and Pulsonix here, and am looking forward to using one of them. It would appear that Easy-PC is a bargain, and that Pulsonix is priced in between Easy-PC and OrCad+PADS.
Q.1. Any recommendations about the strengths of one over the other ?
One concern I have is that sometime in the future I may want to ship a schematic out for someone else to lay out, and that would probably be in PADS. Pulsonix explicitly supports a variety of netlist formats incl PADS, so that's no problem. Easy-PC has native and generic netlist formats. The generic looks easy to read, but that doesn't mean PADS will read it ! I'm not too keen on writing my own translation program, simple though it may be.
Q.2. Has anyone been down this road reading Easy-PC netlist into PADS PowerPCB ?
Thanks for your help,
-rajeev-