hi! can anybody tell me, where i can define in protel99se, that the autorouter places no vias at pads? i=B4d like to design a 2-layer layout to solder by hand. so there must not be vias directly at pads of components. because i can=B4t solder them on the toplayer...=20
many thanks in advance!!
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
P
Peter Bennett
In my experience, Protel does not place vias in pads - any CAD system that did would be seriously flawed.
You can create your own component footprints that have pads only on the bottom layer - then the autorouter will be forced to connect to them on the bottom layer.
(By the way - you can route your board manually if you wish - then you have full control of how you connect to component pads, and where vias are placed.)
Peter Bennett VE7CEI
email: peterbb4 (at) interchange.ubc.ca
GPS and NMEA info and programs: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter/index.html
Newsgroup new user info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/nnq
J
Joel Kolstad
This isn't true. There are plenty of PCB manufacturers and board builders out there who are perfectly capable of dealing with "via in pad" designs; being able to utilize such a feature can produce noticeable improvements in signal integirty as well as board density.
That being said, I've never seen a PCB system that couldn't be set to keep vias out of pads, since it is the more traditional/lower tech way of doing things.
P
Pooh Bear
You mean you don't want a PTH don't you ?
Graham
C
Christoph
thanks, for your answers...!
okay - to create footprints without "toplayer-pads" - that would be an idea!
@graham: no, i=B4d like to create a PTH
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.