Trevor Tosspot admits he seeks a total ban on the private ownership of handguns

Yeah, what a political knee jerk that one was. "I know, why don't we
take all the licensed weapons 'cause we can find those and give all the
crims a better advantage ??".

Hey Twevor,
What's your plan for taking the weapons away from the crims?

He doesn't, anti-gun zealots have previously admitted they don't have
a problem with criminals owning guns illegally.

So their plan is to confiscate guns from law-abiding citizens?

WHAT ON EARTH FOR???

The plan was implemented some time ago and some very nice semi-auto's
were destroyed so the governments of the day could be seen to be
taking stern and rapid action after a nutter shot up a city centre.

How many did you see before?

Here's one <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoddle_Street_massacre .

Bert, bert...
To such as dechuckles, that is an irrelevant issue.
    Making a false claim of causation to push his gun-control agenda is all
that it takes to justify such a lie.
 

"In 1998, Abbott established a trust fund called "Australians for
Honest Politics Trust" to help bankroll civil court cases against the
One Nation party and its founders, Pauline Hanson and David Ettridge.
[46] Prosecution resulted in Hanson & Ettridge being imprisoned.[47]
The conviction against Hanson was ultimately overturned, leading to
criticism of a range of politicians for political interference by the
adjudicating justice."

Do you really think Abbott would behave any different to Howard?

I will never support the Liberal Party again, no way, no how. I make
sure whenever I go to the polls I wear a club badge of some
description, I take great delight in pointing it out to whoever is
handing out the Liberal Party how to vote cards and asking "What are
my guns worth now?" They never seem to appreciate it.

He doesn't, anti-gun zealots have previously admitted they don't have
a problem with criminals owning guns illegally.

Cite pleae :-)

On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 12:31:29 +1000, B J Foster



Notice he doesn't respond......

Yes, like the Greens, he has no plan other than to take them away from the
soft targets who are the Licenced firearm holders.

Guns in general are not licensed for self defense in Australia

That's true and with the increase in armed invasions I reckon it should
be reconsidered.

You really want to walk around in your home all the time with a loaded gun?
Should it be compulsory?

It should be up to the individual to have that choice should they feel
the need.

No it shouldn't because by feeling the need they automatically show
themselves to unsuitable to hold a gun license

Liar , the desire to protect ones self and family IS the very reason to
own  small arms  , passing a fair test for carry is terribly difficult
and determines well that the permit holder is  reliable and safe in
ownership

So those who don't pass this test don't have the right to protect their
families? That is sick. Kid down my way nearly got abducted should he have
the right to carry for protection? Come on it is all in if guns are for
protection