fabrieks toegangscode nodig

Wie is er bekend met Digital Cabel Receivers. Kan ik daar nog iets mee? Ik heb de orginele kaart erbij gekregen. Valt deze kaart nog opnieuw te activeren?

Ik kreeg n.l. zo`n apparaat van het type Panasonic type TU-DC4ORD welke zo te zien door de vorige eigenaar in de fabrieksinstellingen is klaargezet. Er wordt tijdens de ingebruikname als eerste verzocht om een fabrieks toegangscode in te voeren zodat het toestel vervolgens alle aanwezige kanalen op de kabel van Home tv gaat opzoeken. Wie helpt me op weg met de fabriekscode.

E.e.a. zal hoogst waarschijnlijk in de gebruiksaanwijzing vermeld staan. Helaas zat die niet meer bij het toestel. aanwezig.

F
Reply to
Frederieke
Loading thread data ...

Frederieke vond het nodig het volgende mede te delen:

Als je nu van die O (letter o van O ja!) een 0 (want dat ben je ;-) had gemaakt en ff gegoegeld had, dan had je snel het volgende doc gevonden:

formatting link

het antwoord is 1111, u bent door naar de volgende ronde!

Martin

--
*******************************
Martin Borsje
Reply to
Martin Borsje

"Martin Borsje" schreef in bericht news: snipped-for-privacy@titan.eu...

Bedankt Martin Voor je snelle reactie. Ik kon helaas niet het typeplaatje aflezen en dacht een O te zien inplaats van een 0 Nogmaals bedankt! Weet je overigens of er nog mogelijkheden bestaan voor het activeren van de orginele kaart? Ik ga ervan uit dat deze inmiddels zijn geldigheid wel verloren hebben.

gr Frederieke

Reply to
Frederieke

Frederieke vond het nodig het volgende mede te delen:

ik heb geen digital cable receiver

Google is your friend!

--
*******************************
Martin Borsje
Reply to
Martin Borsje

Een 'vriend' of een Grote Broer?!

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Keyhole, the satellite imaging company that Google acquired in October 2004, was funded by the CIA.

"We are moving to a Google that knows more about you." ? Google CEO Eric Schmidt, February 9, 2005

Since 2000, Google has recorded your search terms, the date-time of each search, the globally-unique ID in your cookie (it expires in 2038), and your IP address. This information is available to governments on request. If your favorite site features a Google search box, ask them to install their own local site search. They could also use our site search for webmasters, which shows the same results without the tracking.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

  1. Google's immortal cookie:

Google was the first search engine to use a cookie that expires in 2038. This was at a time when federal websites were prohibited from using persistent cookies altogether. Now it's years later, and immortal cookies are commonplace among search engines; Google set the standard because no one bothered to challenge them. This cookie places a unique ID number on your hard disk. Anytime you land on a Google page, you get a Google cookie if you don't already have one. If you have one, they read and record your unique ID number.

  1. Google records everything they can:

For all searches they record the cookie ID, your Internet IP address, the time and date, your search terms, and your browser configuration. Increasingly, Google is customizing results based on your IP number. This is referred to in the industry as "IP delivery based on geolocation."

  1. Google retains all data indefinitely:

Google has no data retention policies. There is evidence that they are able to easily access all the user information they collect and save.

  1. Google won't say why they need this data:

Inquiries to Google about their privacy policies are ignored. When the New York Times (2002-11-28) asked Sergey Brin about whether Google ever gets subpoenaed for this information, he had no comment.

  1. Google hires spooks:

Matt Cutts, a key Google engineer, used to work for the National Security Agency. Google wants to hire more people with security clearances, so that they can peddle their corporate assets to the spooks in Washington.

  1. Google's toolbar is spyware:

With the advanced features enabled, Google's free toolbar for Explorer phones home with every page you surf, and yes, it reads your cookie too. Their privacy policy confesses this, but that's only because Alexa lost a class-action lawsuit when their toolbar did the same thing, and their privacy policy failed to explain this. Worse yet, Google's toolbar updates to new versions quietly, and without asking. This means that if you have the toolbar installed, Google essentially has complete access to your hard disk every time you connect to Google (which is many times a day). Most software vendors, and even Microsoft, ask if you'd like an updated version. But not Google. Any software that updates automatically presents a massive security risk.

  1. Google's cache copy is illegal:

Judging from Ninth Circuit precedent on the application of U.S. copyright laws to the Internet, Google's cache copy appears to be illegal. The only way a webmaster can avoid having his site cached on Google is to put a "noarchive" meta in the header of every page on his site. Surfers like the cache, but webmasters don't. Many webmasters have deleted questionable material from their sites, only to discover later that the problem pages live merrily on in Google's cache. The cache copy should be "opt-in" for webmasters, not "opt-out."

  1. Google is not your friend:

By now Google enjoys a 75 percent monopoly for all external referrals to most websites. Webmasters cannot avoid seeking Google's approval these days, assuming they want to increase traffic to their site. If they try to take advantage of some of the known weaknesses in Google's semi-secret algorithms, they may find themselves penalized by Google, and their traffic disappears. There are no detailed, published standards issued by Google, and there is no appeal process for penalized sites. Google is completely unaccountable. Most of the time Google doesn't even answer email from webmasters.

  1. Google is a privacy time bomb:

With 200 million searches per day, most from outside the U.S., Google amounts to a privacy disaster waiting to happen. Those newly-commissioned data-mining bureaucrats in Washington can only dream about the sort of slick efficiency that Google has already achieved.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Dit zijn maar enkele citaten van

formatting link

Tip: Laat veel minder 'sporen' achter door te Googlen via Scroogle:

formatting link

Of gebruik

formatting link

m1z

Reply to
m1z

m1z vond het nodig het volgende mede te delen:

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Mijn oudere broer is tevens mijn vriend....

--
*******************************
Martin Borsje
Reply to
Martin Borsje

Die is meestal vier maal de nul 0.

--
Groeten,
André
http://www.xs4all.nl/~bausie/
Reply to
bausie.

In welke volgorde?

F.

Reply to
>>---> Flying Tiger

">>---> Flying Tiger

Reply to
Frederieke

">>---> Flying Tiger

Reply to
Jopie

Reply to
Harry

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.