Texas power prices briefly soar to $9,000/MWh as heat wave bakes state

Whoey Louie wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

We have never had it so how can you say it is a thing?

We have had war using conventional weapons and we have ENDED a war using two single device nuclear strikes.

The world has never had any back and forth 'nuclear war' and likely never will.

The next lessons learned by the world will define the US, and the UK and our 135 allies as the leaders of the free nations of the world and we have already defined and proven that communist factions like China and North Korea and what Russia wants to return to as the worst human rights social structures known to man. The current situation in Hong Kong is a perfect example.

snipped retarded shit that *you* should have snipped.

You are an irrational abject idiot and decidedly it has not worked out for you. Nice try though, idiot. You keep barking that same tone like a little female chihuahua. It really shows you for the pathetic twerp you are.

You act like I just made up some crazy term, that's never been used before. Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?

That's wildly optimistic, knowing how just about all other weapons of war have been used and knowing history. An important part of that history is that irrational, bad actors, truly evil people do come to power. It's only a matter of time before one comes along that has nukes. KJU could be that one.

Unintelligible, even by your standards.

Irrelevant of course. All those are rational actors, where deterrence works.

Obviously you;re just as ignorant as some others here that deterrence requires rational parties and eventually we'll likely wind up with an irrational actor that has nukes.

Wrong, always wrong.

Like Bill's...... what? Brain? LOL!

-- This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

Trader4 imagines that because my google searches don't show up only the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.

Cursitor Doom has the same kind of problem - he gets his information from the Daily Mail and Russia Today, and resolutely refuses to believe that they are giving him deceptively edited and misleading information.

Trader4 makes a habit of snipping the links I do find and post to illustrate the defects in his view of the world, so his claim that I lack the skills to use Google properly should be seen as one more example of his wishful thinking.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Whoey Louie wrote in news:7853e23b-1618- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Go away, little girl.

No, I told you that when you disputed that libs here have been howling since 2016 about Trump and Russian collusion. Or when you deny that there are 50 nuclear power plants under construction around the world, stupid Aussie troll.

right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.

Not something that I've noticed, and you've never provided a single link to an example. It's well known that the Russians did help Trump get his - thi n - majority in the electoral college. Collusion was suspected, but there's no evidence that Trump even knew that he was being helped - and reasonable people never saw him as anybody fit to collude with.

n around the world, stupid Aussie troll.

Since the few that I know about are all behind schedule and way over budget , I was wondering where you'd got your figure.

Somebody else found a nuclear power plant manufacturer's site, which didn't say anything about delays or being over budget, pretty much as you'd expec t and I'd expected.

The web is full of bad information, and dim-wits like you can be relied on to find it. If you won't tell us where you get your misleading information, it's reasonable to suspect you of inventing it, not that you are rational enough to understand why.

The stupidity is all yours.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

There you go again, and then you wonder why I say you're a stupid, lib Aussie troll. Even your buddy DL just acknowledged that it's true. Ask him for your links.

ote:

the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.

k to an example.

Actually, he didn't. You are too stupid to understand what he did say.

You made the claim, which you are totally incapable of documenting. You nee d to find the evidence.

Actually, what you need is a working brain, and that clearly isn't going to happen.

I suspect you are confusing the idea that Russia intervened in the 2016 el ection to support Trump - which it certainly did - and idea that Trump had some kind of deal with the Russians where he offered them something for tha t intervention, which is conceivable but for which Mueller couldn't find an y evidence.

Nobody likes the fact that Russia intervened. Trump resents the suggestion that he might have collaborated with the Russians, which would not play wel l with the people silly enough to support him, and labels the whole questio n fake news, as he would, even if it were true.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Whoey Louie wrote in news:5f056fc4-24be-4cc5- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Yes you did.

You are too goddamned stupid to even remember the shit you have spewed into this group.

Whoey Louie wrote in news:5f056fc4-24be- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Trump is not "my guy" you retarded f*ck. A person of a party does not have to be behind or with all of the members of the party.

It is called dissention, idiot. And I am not the only republican against the bastard. And you are a complete and utter immature idiot to think those against him "enable him".

And I am not enabling him.

If you post you name and address though, I'l be enabled and sure to come over and un enable you, traitorous dumbfuck.

Whoey Louie wrote in news:5f056fc4-24be- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Then...

Go away, little girl.

Or post your name and address and I'll come over and introduce you to a bunch... of knuckles.

Run, fat ass.... RUN! Run over and update your LITS!

e:

ly the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.

ink to an example.

eed to find the evidence.

to happen.

election to support Trump - which it certainly did - and idea that Trump ha d some kind of deal with the Russians where he offered them something for t hat intervention, which is conceivable but for which Mueller couldn't find any evidence.

I know you don't know the meaning of the world collusion. But then that's no surprise. You're so stupid that you keep denying that libs here have been howling about Trump and Russian collusion since 2016.

n that he might have collaborated with the Russians,

And you say that as if he shouldn't resent it. Go figure. Of course if you or some of your favorite libs had any kind of accusation leveled against them and after two years and $30 mil, there was zero evidence it was true, why then it would be a very different story.

e:

ote:

only the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.

link to an example.

b

need to find the evidence.

g to happen.

6 election to support Trump - which it certainly did - and idea that Trump had some kind of deal with the Russians where he offered them something for that intervention, which is conceivable but for which Mueller couldn't fin d any evidence.

Trader4 makes some bizarre claims.

libs > here have been howling about Trump and Russian collusion since 2016 .

All I've said is that I've not seen any evidence of it. If you are so convi nced that it has been happening, you should be able to provide a link to an example.

Since you haven't, we have to assume that you can't.

The Mueller investigation was into "into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election". It found quite a lot.

"It also identifies links between Trump campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government, about which several persons connected to the campaign made false statements and obstructed investigations."

The possibility that Trump or some of his campaign officials might actively have collaborated with the Russians was looked into.

Trump has always wanted to depict the investigation as solely looking at him - it's what egomaniacs do - but it doesn't happen to be true.

His claim that the investigation "exonerated" him is pure spin, based on the false propositon that they were only looking for collaboration.

The $30 million dollar investigation found a whole lot of Russian intervention, and has already put a few of Trump's campaign team into prison. Mueller seems to suggest that Trump may be in line for prosecution once he stops being president.

Mueller did a whole lot better than Ken Starr could manage.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

: :

ote:

p only the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.

le link to an example.

lib

.

ou need to find the evidence.

ing to happen.

016 election to support Trump - which it certainly did - and idea that Trum p had some kind of deal with the Russians where he offered them something f or that intervention, which is conceivable but for which Mueller couldn't f ind any evidence.

at libs > here have been howling about Trump and Russian collusion since 20

2. >

vinced that it has been happening, you should be able to provide a link to an example.

And yet here you are, a lib, howling about Trump and Russian collusion yourself. Thanks for proving my point. Oh, the irony....

You deny that libs have been howling about Trump and Russian collusion since 2016, yet here you are, doing exactly that, yourself. Thanks for helping prove my point.

Whoey Louie wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

You did not make any point, dumbfuck.

You spewed some lame shit that *YOU* believe, and used lame monikers that show *YOU* for the total retard that you are.

You are exactly that... a lame Usenet trolling, POINTLESS utter retard.

Whoey Louie wrote in news:a8703665-5bf7- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

I do not opine on politics, and I will not opine to a total piece of shit like TraitorTard4. You dig, you traitortard f*****ad?

It is not refusal, dipshit.

You do not rate. BIG difference. get a clue. Not only do I not want to discuss something with a total, hard wired, self impotent, bent brained piece of shit retard like you, but given the opportunity, I would gladly remove you or at least your ability to sully the human gene pool any further.

You are a waste of oxygen, and the shit you exhale is boderline hazardous.

Even a tardigrade has more on the ball than you do.

They can survive the vacuum of space. It would be great to see if you could. My bet is no.

Really though... I'd rather simulate a deep dive and infuse your blood heavy with nitrogen and then bring you back to atmospheric and watch you scream and pop!

Hey... a new Kervorkian machine...

The Benzomatic!