Hi,
We've been casually shopping for a new vehicle. Many of them now come with front-facing cameras that attempt to "watch where you're going".
They use these to provide features like detecting when you are deviating from your lane, approaching some moving/stationary object, creeping up on a vehicle ahead of you (e.g., while on cruise control), etc.
The cameras, of necessity (?) are mounted forward and high -- often
*in* the rear view mirror or in a smallish SEALED (?) enclosure "attached" to the windshield immediately ahead of the rear-view mirror mount.Of course, for cosmetic reasons (?) these enclosures are invariably
*black*.And, exposed to direct sun while in use (driving) -- or, sitting in uncovered parking lots (during daylight hours).
The other day, while sitting in a vehicle at a dealership (i.e., out in an uncovered parking lot) and familiarizing myself with the dash, controls, etc., an error was signaled for one of these "camera-based" features (i.e., "Feature X failure"). "Hmmm... did *I* do that?"
Within a few minutes, "Feature Y failure" (another feature reliant on the camera system). Then, "Feature Z failure", etc. Of course, salesman was quick to rationalize this as "normal behavior" (ha! you mean the features work fine as long as you are *indoors* in an airconditioned tunnel??)
I'd previously assumed under the hood to be the most inhospitable location in a vehicle (and, it probably is, "in general" -- though I suspect you can find certain spots under the hood that are less traumatic than others). I had *not* considered a "box left on the dash" (of course, *anything* would end up *in* a box) to be that significant of a risk. Clearly, in this case, it is (or, a "fluke").
[Of course, it's been 105-110 here so starting with that elevated ambient can't make things any *easier* for this sort of kit!]This begs the 2 questions:
- where (other than the engine compartment) would the worst place for kit be in a vehicle (in a "secure" location -- i.e., trunk or passenger compartment)?
- where would the *best* place (wrt high temp avoidance) be for same?
I'll be putting together a multichannel datalogger to try to get some relative -- and then absolute -- values for select locations in our vehicles (in our climate). I'd like to start with the most likely locations for highs and lows as I'd only be able to monitor several locations at a time; then, repeat the experiment on a different day (with different absolute environmental conditions) to make comparisons, etc.
The low end (temperature) I would imagine would solely be driven by expected outdoor ambients. E.g., I've already encountered -26F and know of places (US) where it gets considerably colder. But, these can be "looked up" in an almanac (it's not like sitting "out in the cold" will yield a COLDER temperature than ambient; whereas sitting "out in the Sun" can significantly affect high temperatures!)