> >
> > Full story:
> >
> >
> >
> > If you haven't upgraded to a 64-bit operating system, you might
> > want to soon.
>
> This has no relevance to comp.sys.raspberrypi, please remove from any
> follow ups.
>
I'd guess it was an attempted troll, but provoked only reasonable (albeit somewhat odd*) discussion.
Win98 anyone?
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
M
Mr. Man-wai Chang
Running Win98SE in Raspberry-Pi? Really an interesting idea... :)
-- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ????? (CSSA):
formatting link
C
Charlie Gibbs
Pull his other leg, Axel - maybe it'll come off too.
I still write freestanding executables for Windows. But I'm probably a dinosaur.
/~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs)
\ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way.
X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855.
/ \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
A
Axel Berger
Are you able to store user settings in the program folder on a recent Windows?
/ \ Mail | -- No unannounced, large, binary attachments, please! --
C
Charlie Gibbs
Dunno. I generally look for a CSV file called .cfg in the current directory (where the executable lives), and allow command-line parameters to override it.
But, as I said, I might be a dinosaur.
/~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs)
\ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way.
X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855.
/ \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
T
The Natural Philosopher
How very single user of you.
"When one man dies it's a tragedy. When thousands die it's statistics."
Josef Stalin
A
Ahem A Rivet's Shot
If he wants per-user config he could use -.cfg or config/default config/fred ... or have multiple user configs in the same file or have per-user installs with the program hard linked in all of them (or just copied given that disc space is plentiful these days). All this assuming that you can write to the program directory.
Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays
C:\>WIN | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/
A
Axel Berger
Yes. Multiuser and terminals are a thing of the sixties. From the late seventies onwards we have such a thing as a "personal" computer. Yes, I am aware that there are good reasons for several different roles of that one user, like safe and adminstrator, but why should I by forced to set up everything several times just for it to be the same?
Yes, there are computers in libraries and such, but those are the exception, not the rule and on top of that most of those are set up
*not* to store user settings, so from the computer's point of view it's single user just the same.
/ \ Mail | -- No unannounced, large, binary attachments, please! --
A
Ahem A Rivet's Shot
You shouldn't of course, that's why applications on sane systems (like Raspbian) have system wide defaults with per-user overrides (TBH I have no idea about Windows I haven't used it in years, hopefully it also supports this approach).
Hmm - until fairly recently we had a family computer with accounts for everyone in the family, it fell into disuse so the last time it broke I didn't fix it.
Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays
C:\>WIN | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.