TIP: Formula for rubber drive band path length

ie the stretched length where it is too restricted to pass a thread around to measure. Or to measure without taking apart a worker, to obtain a spare, before having to take apart to replace. Using callipers, pair of rods and ruler or whatever to take measurements of diameters and so radii and gap, templates, whatever intrusions will allow.

2 pulleys , small diameter "a" and big diameter b and gap between the 2 pulleys c. So distance between pulley centres is a +b +c Straight belt section between the two pulley rims (doubley tangential) is x N is the angle, in degrees, between the line-of-centres and the b radius to the tangent point of the large pulley. Also the angle between this extended line and the radius a of the small pulley.

Parallelogram with parallel sides a, b and the other two sides x and (a+b+c) and two right angles. So reducing the parallelogram by lenghth "a" down to a right angle triangle of lengths x, b, (a+b+c) and N between b and (a+b+c)

x = sqrt [(a+b+c)^2 - (b-a)^2]

and N= cos(-1) [ (b-a)/(a+b+c)]

Then band length = 2x + 2*Pi*a (2N/360) + 2*Pi*b[1 - (2N/360)]

Confirmed practically in one case anyway

-- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on

formatting link

Reply to
N_Cook
Loading thread data ...

I think that your math is correct, but I worked out the formula using radians, not degrees, so I would have to convert my formulas to the degree form before I could say that yours is correct.

There is however one small quibble. In the first part of your explanation, you state that "a" and "b" are are diameters, and of course you meant that these are the radii, as you correctly state later on.

This brings back memories. The total length of a belt around two pulleys of different diameters was a trig problem in my 11th grade algebra-trig class. Only two of us thought we had the correct solution, and I, the

11th grader, got it right. The other guy, a 12th grader, got the tangential lengths correct, but screwed up the lengths that are wrapped around the pulleys.

I got to present my solution at the board in front of the whole class. :)

--- Joe

Reply to
Joe

confirmed, my error , a+b+c beween centres is correct, a and b are radii. I edited , incompletely, from diameters to radii, also the word radius gauge templates should have been inserted after the word ruler

Reply to
N_Cook

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.