This was a rhetorical question, as anyone with half a brain could tell. Apparently the two of you combined don't manage to achieve even that minimum standard of intelligence.
This was a rhetorical question, as anyone with half a brain could tell. Apparently the two of you combined don't manage to achieve even that minimum standard of intelligence.
I see you can tap-dance.
And yet you are as factless as you are brainless.
Corrected to match the contents of this thread.
-- That's not what you're jealous of, what you're jealous of is that we _can_ and you're enraged that you're impotent and there's nothing you can do about it. What would you have done in our place? Let Saddam Hussein _keep_ amassing a fortune and biding his time so that he _could_ complete the development of weapons and delivery systems which would inundate our friends? Probably, and then you'd be bitching about "Geez, if only you guys had done it this way..." Fuck you, and if you don't like it, tough shit. If you think you know a better way to prosecute the war, then write to the President and tell him about it instead of just uselessly flapping your gums here.
Not at all. When you see the village idiot blow up the police station it's probably worth asking yourself if this was the smartest or dumbest thing he has ever done. I see Bob Woodward has just answered that question.
Let him have Kuwait and keep gasoline at 99 cents per gallon.
Why? He can't or won't read, he couldn't understand it anyway, and he always does what Cheney tells him to do so it's a pointless exercise. Tony Snow isn't the spokesthing for the administration -- Dubya is.
What the hell does taking his high blood pressure medicine have to do with how he treats a troll?
-- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
I know you are the King of the Trolls but why do you care about one of them?
Not me. Is THAT your problem?
--- Not me!
Over the last year or so I had a couple of really scary episodes where my blood pressure went up to something like 220/150 and I wound up in the hospital with some serious drugs needed to bring it down to "normal". Since then we've gotten it down to around 120/60 (a near miracle, ISTM) where it sits most of the time, even when I'm ragging on trash like Homer, but thanks for asking. ;)
-- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
-- A good king always worries about his subjects.
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 11:06:27 -0500, John Fields did most oddly ask:
There'd be no rhetoric?
-- ________________________________________________________________________ Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5 Demon Lord of Confusion COOSN-029-06-71069 Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.* Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered! "It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine.. 'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur reached new heights, in Message-ID:
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H. L. Mencken
"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'
"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them up." -- William Rivers Pitt
And yet mine runs 110/70 no matter what you post. You should give it up.
Gee, why am _I_ not surprised? Of course, who cares what happens to a bunch of worthless, lowlife grunts who were lucky enough to visit the Middle East on the taxpayer's dime? They were just lower-income types anyway, right? Not useful people, like the rich. Not anyone who _matters_. Well, aside from the rich people who volunteered, but they were silly. Leave the actual fighting to the little people, the cannon fodder -- it's what they're for.
Right?
-- ________________________________________________________________________ Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5 Demon Lord of Confusion COOSN-029-06-71069 Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.* Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered! "It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine.. 'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur reached new heights, in Message-ID: "Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H. L. Mencken "Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other part of the so-called 'War on Terror.' "If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them up." -- William Rivers Pitt
-- I'm not posting to try to raise your blood pressure, I just like bashing the bashers.
No, you like trolling. I like catching trolls, dragging them into the boat, whacking them on the head with a 2 by 4, and tossing them back for shark bait.
Thanks!
Do you plan to do that soon?
-- Their families and friends do, and their country does.
John Fields wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:
No it doesn't. That wasn't part of the deal, as you said yourself and now appear to contradict. The sooner people take some personal responsibility instead of displacing and enshrining it in some kind of veneer of patriotism, the sooner people will stop dying stupidly for nothing.
-- That may be what you _like_, but right now _you're_ the one with the hook in his mouth.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.