My Eizo T766 CRT monitor has been turning brighter for years, ever since I got it. I used to be able to correct it using the cut-off and gain controls in the on screen menu, but the red had reached 0%, so I was out of lee-way. Therefore, I resorted to adjusting the flyback transformer.
Anyway, my question is, what could be causing a monitor to turn brighter? Every other monitor I know turns darker over time.
And on a sidenote, when calibrating the flyback transformer, what voltage is it you're adjusting? Acceleration voltage?
The adjustment on the HV multiplier is the G2 or screen grid voltage. In actual fact, it must be within a specific spec range. The tube bias settings must be set to make the cut-off for each colour-gun in the tube properly track and work within proper range. On most monitors manufactured after
1994, most of these settings are done through a specific service set-up and manufacture software using their dedicated hardware interface for the particular monitor.
Obviously some component or device is going defective, thus causing the brightness to be changed. Many times, I found the HV multiplier to be the fault. Sometimes, it has been other types of components in the bias and drive circuits that work with the CRT.
If there is adequate range, you can try to turn down the G2 bias on the HV module. This will only be a temporary fix. The characteristics of the colour tracking and the black cut-off levels will be most likely be changed when this control is adjusted.
I would be seriously considering to get a new LCD panel at this point. You will find it superior to an old CRT monitor.
--
JANA
_____
"Wiebe Cazemier" wrote in message
news:43406$47710cdc$d4cc82be$856@cache2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl...
Hi,
My Eizo T766 CRT monitor has been turning brighter for years, ever since I
got
it. I used to be able to correct it using the cut-off and gain controls in
the
on screen menu, but the red had reached 0%, so I was out of lee-way.
Therefore, I resorted to adjusting the flyback transformer.
Anyway, my question is, what could be causing a monitor to turn brighter?
Every
other monitor I know turns darker over time.
And on a sidenote, when calibrating the flyback transformer, what voltage is
it
you're adjusting? Acceleration voltage?
Regards,
Wiebe Cazemier
You need to run the color restoration as shown on page 16 of the user manual. The monitor must be on for a minimum of 60 minutes, no screen saver or power save mode, in order for this option to come up. This will compensate for the wear on the picture tube if you did not wait too long to run it.
Do you think I would know how to adjust the flyback transformer but not know about this feature... :)? It didn't compensate for the overly bright image.
I had already changed the bias on the HV module. When I did so, the image looked somewhat bluish. I ran the the automatic color restoration feature, which dkuhajda mentioned, and everything was corrected. The reference image I created to calibrate cut-off and gain of each individual color shows a perfect image.
BTW, the automatic color restoration never seemed to have done anything in the past. But after changing the HV bias, it did work (I could see it do things it never did before).
BTW2, I don't think some component is going bad. It's not as if it started doing this suddenly. In the course of the 4 years that I've had it, it slowly turned brighter.
Also, the HV bias is very touchy. When I turned it down just a tad without looking at the screen, it went completely black. Could it be possible that for some reason, like heat contraction/expansion, the HV bias control changed gradually?
This is the last 19" CRT Made by Eizo, using a Sony Trinitron apature grill tube; it's one of the best CRT's out there. I bought it in 2003. And I find the image quality far, far superior to any TFT I've seen. It still works perfectly, besides the screen slowly getting brighter (which is fixed for now).
I don't like TFT and I will never get one, if possible. I don't like the concept of backlights, I don't like the concept of dithering 18 bit color to produce 16.2 milion (not 16.7 as true 24 bit would be), I don't like native resolutions inherent in low-DPI fixed pixel displays, etc.
I didn't know my monitor had this feature until relatively recently, and I had already been inside it searching for a screen adjustment on the flyback. Ended up needing the Sony DAS software to get everything where it should be though.
It's what they want you to have and you will like it. You
will have one regardless the price they dictate and pay it!
And wait, that's not all. After you are forced into giving them your money for something you don't want. It'll be obsolete just after you walk out the store and repairs will be many times more than just going though the same ordeal again which they will so condition you to adhere too!
Btw. Have a great Xmas!
--
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5"
Sadly, you are correct. The industry needed something new. And unfortunately, most people want these TFT screens because of their small size. The real high-end user has to suffer for the ignorance of the masses. It amazes me how much effect the appearance of the actual machine has on the quality of the screen, for most people. I could write an entire essay about that subject...
Luckily, these Eizo screens are made to last. With the calibration features it offers, the picture's is as good as new after 14608 hours of use. A low-end monitor would almost have reached its MTBF by now...
With some luck, SED screens are available when this monitor dies. The technology exists, but there are license issues. SED is still a fixed pixel grid, but at least works on the basis of color addition (like your eyes!) as opposed to color polarization and subtraction.
BTW, I just watched some DVD on this screen. The absolute blackness this monitor offers is SO important for the image quality. As soon as the slightest bit of grey starts to leak through, the entire image quality suffers; it just looses its feel. It's as if you throw a bucket of paint over a Van Gogh... I always compare backlight bleeding to noise in audio. For some reason, people dispise the latter, but accept the former...
Same to you. Bet you got a TFT screen for christmas :)
When I used to service monitors, I changed many of these HV multipliers to correct the fault you are describing. In most monitors it is part of the flyback assembly. On the odd occasion, I have had CRT's starting to go defective to also cause this problem.
Personally, I would consider changing the monitor for a good LCD type. Then you will be good for a number of years without any problems.
--
Jerry G.
I had already changed the bias on the HV module. When I did so, the image looked somewhat bluish. I ran the the automatic color restoration feature, which dkuhajda mentioned, and everything was corrected. The reference image I created to calibrate cut-off and gain of each individual color shows a perfect image.
BTW, the automatic color restoration never seemed to have done anything in the past. But after changing the HV bias, it did work (I could see it do things it never did before).
BTW2, I don't think some component is going bad. It's not as if it started doing this suddenly. In the course of the 4 years that I've had it, it slowly turned brighter.
Also, the HV bias is very touchy. When I turned it down just a tad without looking at the screen, it went completely black. Could it be possible that for some reason, like heat contraction/expansion, the HV bias control changed gradually?
This is the last 19" CRT Made by Eizo, using a Sony Trinitron apature grill tube; it's one of the best CRT's out there. I bought it in 2003. And I find the image quality far, far superior to any TFT I've seen. It still works perfectly, besides the screen slowly getting brighter (which is fixed for now).
I don't like TFT and I will never get one, if possible. I don't like the concept of backlights, I don't like the concept of dithering 18 bit color to produce 16.2 milion (not 16.7 as true 24 bit would be), I don't like native resolutions inherent in low-DPI fixed pixel displays, etc.
In these monitors, what exactly is going bad? The HV multiplier is nothing but a bunch of copperwire wrapped around some core, right? How can that wear down...?
No flame intended, but I really don't understand why people are advising me to get a new TFT screen. The issue I described is a very minor. The drift has been so slow that every few months the colors needed a bit of calibration. The colors are still extremely pure, black is pitch black, white is brightly white, the image is sharp, high voltage regulation is perfect (so the image is stable under all brightness conditions, RGB convergence is good, etc. In other words, it displays a perfect picture.
Even if you didn't dispise TFT's like I do (see my other posts), you would be mad to replace this screen only because the HV bias needed a minor adjustment... If it were 10 or 15 years old, perhaps there would be some logic to it, but after 4 years of use and the MTBF not reached by a long shot...?
I thought all flybacks had adjustment controls nowadays. I guess then I'm lucky this monitor still had them, seeing as how it's the most modern CRT every made.
Is a ViewSonic a low-end monitor? Mine is about 5 years old, gets two to three hours' (at least) use each day, and is running fine. I have no intention of buying an LCD display until this monitor fails (or I buy my next computer).
There was a time when Eizo was pretty much _the_ monitor to own. It is not longer a highly visible brand, at least not in the US.
The current consensus is that the license issues will not be resolved and we will never see SED displays.
I've wondered why we haven't seen much in the plasma-based computer displays. I can think of a number of reasons, including limited resolution for a given screen size and significantly higher power consumption.
subtraction.
Way incorrect.
All current LCDs use additive color. Some years back there were LCD panels for transparencey projectors that used subtractive synthesis. This allowed significantly higher resolution, but had no other advantage I can think of.
If you want to get picky about it, subtractive systems are "additive" in that (for example) the yellow layer -- and only the yellow layer -- controls the amount of blue light in the image. The blue light passed by the yellow layer is "added" to the green light passed by the magenta layer and the red light passed by the cyan layer. (This is all semantics, of course. I'm making a point, not trying to "prove" something.)
I have no idea what you mean by "color polarization". The polarized layers in an LCD are _not_ used to create colors (such as the colors seen when placing plastics between crossed polarizers).
Defective 200V line electrolytic filter capacitor?. Reduced capacitance due to drying electrolyte. Doesn't charge to 180 or 200 volts anymore causing lower cathode voltages thereby driving beam current up. Usually a 22uF/250V. Merry Xmas Jango
I don't know much about ViewSonic. It's not, or hardly, available here. But with low-end, I meant the cheapest models. I have a Philips 105S here, which is one of those. Image quality has degraded significantly over the three years I used it.
This Eizo monitor has been running about 12 hours per day or more (I work at home) for the last few years. The hours of use I mentioned can be found in the OSD menu.
I would agree. Their TFT screens are no better than others I've seen. As for CRT, it's a long story, but I tried several T766 models and this one was the only one without grave convergence errors. Philips high-end CRT range also suffered from major convergence problems (I had tried 6 different 109p40's before giving up and going for this Eizo...).
But, now that I have this specific one, I'm glad I have it. It still has the "Eizo Legacy" of quality... Not just in image quality, but also in features. I've never seen another monitor which allows you to set the color cut-off in the OSD menu, for example. It could be that there are, but I've never seen one :)
Don't plasma screens wear down very rapidly? Computerscreens are used more than TV's, mostly, so perhaps that's the reason? Or, more likely, they want to exploit the investments made for TFT as much as possible. It's better for them to wait with the introduction of a new technology.
As it says at [1]: "LCD technology is based on the properties of polarized light (...) When an LCD pixel darkens, it polarizes at 90 degrees to the polarizing screens.". However, it could be that I've got stuff mixed up. I do know that wearing polarized sunglassed can make an LCD display (like on a watch) unreadable, but I've never tried it on a TFT LCD screen.
As for the subtraction; the process of creating color in TFT screens starts with white light, which is then turned into the desired color. I call that subtraction. It may not be literal subtraction from the point of view of the sub pixel, but I do think this idea is principally flawed. You cannot make monochromatic light for the RGB colors that way. The phosphor photon-emission of a CRT comes much closer, if not completely.
Anyway, you seem to know more about TFT screens that I do, but that doesn't take away the fact that I don't like them ;). Image quality is just too poor, and the manufacturers cheat to get higher specs, and those cheats are visible.
Drying electrolyte is consistent with the from-the-start slow increase in brightness. Also, I've seen a lot of devices with leaking caps, so they are quite notorious.
BTW, how exactly is the beam current driven up when the voltage decreases? I would have expected it to be the other way around.
Viewsonic is a mid range monitor, I've had a few of them and they provide good performance for the price, but there's better monitors out there. Some models were very prone to failure, I replaced at least half a dozen optocouplers in the power supplies, they would fail slowly and cause the voltage to creep up until it blew the vertical output IC.
Eizo monitors are really excellent. I recently repaired a 14 year old Nanao (former name of Eizo) monitor my mom has, a few new capacitors and it has a razor sharp image, it's still perfectly serviceable.
TFT monitors are good for laptops, and anywhere space is critical, I have a nice big one at work which does look pretty good, but the flat Sony CRT I have at home is far superior to my eyes.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.