I have changed my Linux 2.6.26 configuration from 250 HZ to 1000 HZ to get more samples when using oprofile in timer interrupt mode. Besides increasing the number of timer interrupts, are there other effects from increasing HZ from 250 to 1000?
You have increased the chances of losing timer ticks to the clock, messing up your system time.
Yes, you increase the frequency at which the scheduler kicks in. That in turn means that if there is more than one runnable process more context switches and more TLB and cache flushes. I wouldn't imagine that it would amount to a particuarly significant increase in overhead but it is an increase in overhead never the less.
Having said that I'm reading this in c.a.e. and am not really a Linux expert. I'm more of a BSD man myself so I can't really steer you down a better avenue.
-- Andrew Smallshaw andrews@sdf.lonestar.org
If all software is done according to the most recent standards, normal software should not notice the difference. There even is a HZ setting for Kernel space and a different one for user programs, so even user programs that rely on the standard setting, instead of using the HZ constant for timing issues, should work as expected. The faster interrupt rate of course might reduce the overall system performance, while increasing responsiveness for soft realtime applications.
-Michael
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.