There are a lot of RTOSes around. I wonder which are the most used ones. In particular, I'm interested in the free ones supporting the STM8, which currently are:
But I'd also like to know about the general 8/16-bit situation.
Philipp
Seems, there is also
While I can't find the STM8 support in current ChibiOS anymore.
Philipp
FreeRTOS
-- Chisolm Republic of Texas
I see that people asked for a STM8 port a few times, and over ayear ago someone posted a port to the forum:
Philipp
On 26th December 2015, Philipp Colin Krause sent: |-------------| |"[. . .] | |[. . .] STM8,| |[. . .] | | | |[. . .]" | |-------------|
I advise against STMicroelectronics, as I documented via e.g. "Referees Often Miss Obvious Errors in Computer and Electronic Publications", "Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance", Volume 20, Issue 3.
Regards, Paul Colin Gloster
P.S. If I had time etc. I would play your Blockade (Snake) clone:
Is there some BS here? I searched for this document and found it has nothing to do with STM. What's your game? Are you just trying to increase sales of your paper?
-- Rick
On December 30th, 2015, Rickman sent: |---------------------------------------------------------------------| |"On 12/30/2015 1:20 PM, Nicholas Collin Paul de Gloucester wrote: | |> On 26th December 2015, Philipp Colin Krause sent: | |> |-------------| | |> |"[. . .] | | |> |[. . .] STM8,| | |> |[. . .] | | |> | | | |> |[. . .]" | | |> |-------------| | |> | |> | |> I advise against STMicroelectronics, as I documented via | |> e.g. "Referees Often Miss Obvious Errors in Computer and Electronic| |> Publications", "Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality | |> Assurance", Volume 20, Issue 3. | |> | |> Regards, | |> Paul Colin Gloster | | | |Is there some BS here?" | |---------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. There is BS in publications which STMicroelectronics contributed to which I referred to in "Referees Often Miss Obvious Errors in Computer and Electronic Publications".
|---------------------------------------------------------------------| |"I searched for this document and found it has nothing to | |do with STM." | |---------------------------------------------------------------------|
Thou art mistaken. Cf.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------| |"What's your game?" | |---------------------------------------------------------------------|
Whistleblowing, but it is not a game.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------| |"Are you just trying to increase sales of your | |paper? | | | |-- | | | |Rick" | |---------------------------------------------------------------------|
It is not my paper - it is a paper by me owned by a publisher. More visibility might not hurt. A lot of persons are subscribers and would not need to buy a copy of this paper.
Thy sincerely, Paul Colin Gloster
So you are "whistle-blowing" on buggy code?
-- Rick
Are you locked into a 8 bit uC? Power, pin count, real estate issues?
-- Chisolm Republic of Texas
The free toolchain for STM8 (SDCC, stm8flash, etc) has improved a lot recently. But there is no RTOS that can be used with it yet. Since I might find time to help porting one sometime, I was wondering which one it should be. So far I see three groups of RTOSes wrt. to this:
1) The mainstream ones, that are important, but do not have any STM8 port yet:- FreeRTOS
- Contiki
- RIOT
2) Others, that already have or had an STM8 port using a non-free toolchain:- atomthreads
- ChibiOS
- BuguRTOS
3) Others, that don't see much development any more, and in which documentation seems to be mostly in some language I don't know:- OSA
- mipOS
I guess I will put my attention on one from 2) first, then one from 1).
Philipp
Well, I can't access "Referees Often Miss Obvious Errors in Computer and
Frankfurt. However it seems from
Philipp
Il 26/12/2015 19:54, Philipp Klaus Krause ha scritto:
Maybe you already made this question to yourself. Anyway I make it: why do you need a RTOS on those kind of platforms?
.
hi, It is possible that ChibiOS/RT and ChibiOS/NIL be a good choice
Nestor
On December 31st, 2015, Philipp Nicholas Krause sent: |
On December 30th, 2015, Rickman sent: |---------------------------------------------| |"So you are "whistle-blowing" on buggy code?"| |---------------------------------------------|
Buggy code kills persons via cars and could also kill persons via defective equipment in hospitals and taxes should not be wasted on such code.
Happy New Year.
Regards, Nicholas Collin Paul de Gloucester
I'm not going to argue this indefinitely, but I expect the code they are providing is not guaranteed for safety critical systems. I know I would never use code from any outside source and assume it is bug free. Further, I expect nearly every supplier of code has bugs in their code. Have you found any supplier of perfectly bug free code?
So is the fact their code has bugs the only issue you have with STM? The actions you have taken seem rather extreme for that.
-- Rick
That is true for every device from every manufacturer.
-- Rick
There are no such things as reliable hardware or software !!
There are ways to use redundant systems, but in the long run, adding similar redundant channels doesn't increase the total system reliability. in practice it will reduce the total system reliability.
Ten identical cooling systems in a NPP doesn't improve the total reliability, if all channels suffer from the same problem (such as contaminated fuel in all NPP emergency cooling systems.:-I.
Or a faulty installation procedure for the cylinder head gaskets. It happened at the North Anna plant. When the plant disconnected from the grid during an earthquake, one of the backup generators failed because of this problem. It is not inconceivable that more of them would have failed.
Rick
-- Rick
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.