Was Black Dust - Nobody knows

He did say that it was absolutely certainly just collecting what was in the air. Pity he studiously avoided even commenting on why electrostatic precipitators which are designed to do just that dont end up with JUST THE JET BLACK SOOT SEEN IN MONITORS.

There's a reason why he didnt, he cant explain that obvious problem with his theory.

Pity you cant explain why electrostatic precipitators which are designed to do just that dont end up with JUST THE JET BLACK SOOT SEEN IN MONITORS.

And you have never been able to explain why its seen in monitors everywhere, not just where there can be quite at bit of carbon in the air.

Easy to proclaim. Pity about you not actually having a shred of evidence to substantiate your claim.

Reply to
Rod Speed
Loading thread data ...

And it wouldnt be lacking if you 'soot magnet' theory was the correct explanation.

Pity we aint even discussing whats on the TV glass at all and whats on mine is nothing like jet black. Its just dust colored.

Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh ?

No completely irrelevant side tracks on brown clouds at all eh ?

Irrelevant to his basic claim about it being charged.

Pity it aint even what was being discussed at all.

Pity we were discussing what ends up on the INSIDE OF THE MONITOR CASE ADJACENT TO THE FBT.

And what ends up on the outer glass tube face is nothing like black here, its just dust colored, which happens to be reddish brown here.

in a thread on a "Mad Sci Network" message board about "Why

Pity we werent even discussing TV screens at all.

No one ever said anything like that. The original poster ASKED WHERE THAT BLACK DUST/SOOT ON THE INSIDE OF THE MONITOR CASE IS COMING FROM.

The original question asked

In order to answer the question asked, actually.

Completely trivial for anyone with a clue to prove that for themselves on the insulator claim. And doesnt prove anything much regardless of whether its an insulator or not anyway.

There are much less primitive ways of seeing if its other than carbon soot.

Its more complicated than that too.

How odd that it doesnt feel greasy or tarry.

That proves little when coffee filters clearly let an awful lot of grung thru the filter and just stops the big particles of ground coffee beans.

It still is even if its fine enough to get thru the filter.

Yep, but the fact that you get that jet black soot in monitors where there is bugger all soot in the air is the most compelling evidence against the 'soot magnet' theory.

The acetone will dissolve the food grease, as will petrol.

Reply to
Rod Speed

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:36:38 +1000, "Rod Speed" Gave us:

You're an idiot. How's that for a proclamation?

It is NOT the same environment. Electrostatic dust accumulators operate in a forced air environ. Doh!

They do NOT operate by way of a corona. The field is electrostatic. Doh!

If one touches the dust in the accumulator, it turns JET BLACK where it adheres to the skin. Doh!

If one moisturizes the dust, whether it be with water or non-aqueous mist or smoke, it turns JET BLACK. Doh!

They end up with just the common dust instead.

Reply to
DarkMatter

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:41:54 +1000, "Rod Speed" Gave us:

Evidence? You are a retard.

I make the supply which goes into a very large industrial electrostatic accumulator. Several models, actually. We have said accumulators in house for testing purposes. It is 40 plates over a couple square feet each, at about a 5/8 inch spacing. It is excited at 11kV. That is about HALF what a CRT gets excited at.

I have been there, done that. You have not.

You are just a dweeb retard that was last month trying to hawk "faster than light" communication gear off on people.

Reply to
DarkMatter

Reams of your puerile shit flushed where it belongs.

I said IN the same environment, f****it child.

Got sweet f*ck all to do with whats in the air, f****it child.

Neither do monitors, f****it child.

Just as true of monitors, f****it child.

Pigs arse it does, f****it child.

Pigs arse it does, f****it child.

Try again, f****it child.

Reply to
Rod Speed

Same thing, completely unemployable f****it.

Same thing as inside the monitor when the case is removed, completely unemployable f****it.

Didnt even use the word surface there, completely unemployable f****it.

Reply to
Rod Speed

Even someone as stupid as you should be able to work out that the word surface doesnt even get a mention, if someone was stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane, f****it.

Reply to
Rod Speed

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:29:23 +1000, "Rod Speed" Gave us:

What part of "monitors do NOT have forced air" do you not understand? Doh! Different environment there, I'd say.

Talk about puerile shit. You so full of shit, your eyes are brown, and there is a foul stench emanating from your ears, right above that brown oooze.

Reply to
DarkMatter

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:29:23 +1000, "Rod Speed" Gave us:

It has everything to do with what adheres, dipshit.

An e-field plays a different game on dust in Standing air.

D O H !!!

Reply to
DarkMatter

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:29:23 +1000, "Rod Speed" Gave us:

You are about as mature as a fresh turd.

Reply to
DarkMatter

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:33:06 +1000, "Rod Speed" Gave us:

I'd say that your IQ has dropped about 60 points since you started this utter crap thread. You are obviously clueless about fields, regardless of what you seem to think is some knowledge about particulate.

You have no clue about electronic components either if you think for a second that particulate emissions are some natural effect of their use, when it doesn't happen at all. A *burned up* electronic assembly could exhibit such an effect, but not a *properly functioning*, long life span component in a safety approved consumer device would not.

If you do not think the field is high, stick your finger down there next to where the anode wire enters the FBT, or up on the CRT cup. Be sure to place a foot in the bathtub first, and drop an AC powered radio in for good grounding. This instruction is for you only rod.

No other persons besides ol' roddy here should attempt this act, unless they consult Dr. Kevorkian first. He can be reached through the Michigan state correctional system.

Reply to
DarkMatter

You already stole my name once, then some f****it called Brian Goldsmith accused me of hiding behind a false name. Ha ha ha, stupid troll he was. He wanted to be like Phil, but was too stupid.

Fuck 'em I say.

Reply to
The real Andy

You should change your name to dark splatter .. coz thats all that comes from your mouth..

Reply to
The real Andy

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 18:42:59 +1000, "The real Andy" Gave us:

You should change yours to "the real s*****ad" because that is what you are.

Reply to
DarkMatter

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.