1. Home
  2. Electronics Equipment
  3. FFT Spectrum Analyzer: software-based or standalone?

FFT Spectrum Analyzer: software-based or standalone?

Hello. I work in a physics research lab, and we are planning to purchase a spectrum analyzer. We need to cover the range from DC (actually, 0.1 Hz would be enough) to 300-400 kHz to look at the electronic error signals we get in a laser stabilization experiment (these are just the electronic representation of frequency fluctuations of the laser, most of them due to mechanical vibrations in this range of frequencies). This is the "essential minimum" we need, but since we are making the investment it'd also be nice to be able to go to higher frequencies, we'd have plenty of additional uses for an instrument reaching up to 100 MHz. Ideally the instrument would be of the FFT flavor.

We have been looking at a number of models and there aren't many which cover the low frequencies down to tenths of a Hertz, this seems to be the main limitation. The 89400 series of Agilent seems to be all we need and more, but it costs a kidney, so one option we are considering is to sacrifice a little bit of range in the low frequencies and go with a 4395A (from 10 Hz) or even better, a 4396B (from 2 Hz). These models are more affordable and have the added advantage of incorporating network and impedance analyzer funcionality, which is not essential in our case but certainly nice to have in a lab like ours, we have to build and test plenty of home-made circuits and little gizmos.

The second possibility we are considering is a PC-based solution like the

89600 series, we would only need to purchase a suitable laptop, the software (the 89640 seems adequate) and a hardware front-end like a VXI mainframe. The final price is probably quite a bit lower than that of a standalone instrument.

What I would like is to get some opinions of people who have working experience with these two types of spectrum analyzer, standalone and software-based. Which one would you recommend for lab use? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each one? In terms of functionality, is any of the options clearly superior to the other one? I have only mentioned HP (Agilent) products, but please feel free to recommend any other brands/models that you consider adequate for this task.

Thanks a lot!

Reply to
John Walker
Loading thread data ...

Another low cost solution will be to be a used HP3585A or similar. Exceptionally good performances, DC to 40MHz, 3Hz resolution filter, and cheap... They're not FFT based, but I just bough one on eBay for less than

1000$. And the advantage of non-FFT based equipments is the usually higher dynamic range(80dB in that case).

Friendly, Robert Lacoste - ALCIOM

formatting link

"John Walker" a écrit dans le message de news: snipped-for-privacy@Gilgamesh-frog.org...

"essential

uses

plenty

any

Reply to
Robert Lacoste

( Snip )

One thing you should consider is if you should get two seperate instruments instead of one.

Buy an FFT spectrum analyzer for DC to the low KHz range. Buy a different unit for work above one 1 MHz.

Two specialized tools will probably do a better job than one single one. In addition, it actually might be cheaper to buy two different units.

Aidan Grey

Reply to
Aidan Grey

Yeah, that would we a good solution. In fact, if I were able to find a suitable instrument for the DC-kHz range I'd be happy enough because that is the range where we need one badly, RF is very nice to have access to but not such a pressing need for us. However, I haven't been able to find a suitable one. The closest thing I have found is one of the models offered by SRS (Stanford Research Systems): FFT instruments operating from DC to

100 kHz. Very nice and affordable *but* 100 kHz is too low for us, we need something that goes up to perhaps 300 kHz at least. So back to square one...

I have been looking into the possibility -suggested by another poster- of getting an older, non-FFT model like the HP3585A. It looks tempting enough because for something like $1000 is basically a present... the problem is that I don't really know how convenient non-FFT spectrum analyzers are when you have to make a "noise" measurement, that is, measuring a signal that is jumping around in frequency and amplitude all the time instead of being at a single frequency all the time... What I need to get is really a measurement of noise density (signal density if you prefer to think of it like that, since noise is my signal here) in the frequency range of interest. I suppose it can be done with a non-FFT (sweep) instrument, but won't it take forever? Does anybody have experience with this?

Thanks for your suggestions!

Reply to
John Walker

A software one on a high spec PC can cope with that. I dont know what the jitter is like on a modern soundcard, but if you have a spare PC around, running linux, you can try the FFT program from my website.

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/   ||||   Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with
ketchup.
Reply to
Ian Molton

*arg*.

Didnt see the 100kHz is too low bit. sorry.

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/   ||||   Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with
ketchup.
Reply to
Ian Molton

Sound cards are capacitor coupled, but they do go down to a few Hz.

Spectralab is a good software package, but there are some free ones as well which do quite a lot.

Cheap sound cards often have spurii associated with them.

Bill

Reply to
ctsbillc

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.