Anyone ever considered using USB as a (simple) control network instead of using something like CAN?
The USB master could be a small computer, maybe running Linux. The devices to be controlled could be based on the PIC18F2450 USB Microcontroller.
Bad idea?
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
T
Tim Wescott
AFAIK the rocketry club at Portland State University is planning just that. You would have to manage your network closely to achieve any high level of determinism, but from my small knowledge of USB it could be done.
All in all I think using CAN would be safer, and in the end easier than trying to wedge USB into an application that it wasn't intended for.
Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/
"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" came out in April.
See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
M
Mike Silva
Can you live with the short cable lengths (5m)?
H
Hans-Bernhard Broeker
Probably some people started considering it. But I bet most stopped the moment they realized that USB isn't really a network, by any stretch of the meaning of that word. And that's before you consider that the necessary hubs alone will can easily waste more power than the entire collection of devices you wanted to control.
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker@physik.rwth-aachen.de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.