comp.arch.embedded programming atmega48/168's
I have been programming an atmega168 for the the last few weeks with no trouble. Today an atmega48 was put in the 168's place, and the programming failed. From a quick look, there appeared to be a timeout when polling the flash af0ter a buffer had been written. That was a quick look at the end of the day, though. Has anyone here found differences in the programing of the two versions that might explain this error?
Hul