The difference between using one 555 timer and a 556 timer for PWM control
Aug 15, 2006 8 Replies
M
Mr. J D
I have seen different site using 556 set up as one timer in astable controlling a second timer in monostable mode. Other sites show PWM by using only one 555 timer set up in astable mode. I would really rather use only one 555 timer, but what is the upside to using a setup with a
556 timer?
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
B
BobG
========================================================== Maybe a wider PWM range or more stable frequency can be obtained with the separate trigger timer? What range of duty cycle do you need? 99%? or 10% to 90%?
J
James Thompson
Without seeing the circuit in question, my guess would be to have a timed set of pulses then a rest and another set of pulses. Maybe to fast charge a battery so there is a cool down period ? Tell the link the the circuit in question.
R
Rich Grise
The one with the dual timer gives you "pulse frequency modulation" or PFM, while the single timer gives you "pulse-width modulation", or PWM. One is a stream of equal pulses at a varying frequency, and the other is a stream of variable-width pulses at a constant frequency.
Both ways have advantages and disadvantages - it depends on the application.
Good Luck! Rich
J
John Fields
Using a single 555 in astable mode will only allow duty cycles of
>50%, at any frequency, while using an astable to determine rep rate
and a one-shot to determine the pulse width will allow you to get
from very close to 0% to very close to 100% duty cycle.
M
Mark Fortune
With a diode between pins 7 and 6 you can obtain duty cycles < 50% as it only uses one resistor to charge instead of two.
Mark
J
John Fields
--- Damn! I forgot about the "magic diode"! Good catch.
But, it goes in parallel with R2 and with the anode on pin 7, no?
nix is easy linear technology give away ltspice for windows.
*nix is harder berkely spice is free by works from a command-line... theoretically it can be coupled with oregano (an X-based gui for drawing circuits) but last time I tried I couldn't figure it all out.
Apparently ltspice works well under wine. I haven't tried installing wine yet.
Bye. Jasen
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.