OT: Our Glorious Nutless leader

That rant doesn't make a lot of sense. Who should we declare war on?

It is true that libs want to pack the USA with nonwhite, non Christian, poor, non-English speaking people. Other than expecting them to vote Democratic, I can't understand why.

Our nutless leader?

Can't be upper class unless there is a lower class of peons to push around.

I really think there is something wrong with him, in the sense of a clinical mental problem. He has no identifiable competencies and speaks almost entirely in the first person. He'll use "I", "me", and "my" a dozen times in one paragraph, as if he runs the entire government alone.

I did not vote for him either time. He has embarrassed the US and has done more harm to us than I like to think about.

Great! The more non-Christians, the better. I guess if one believes men come back from the dead, one will believe anything.

On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:31:25 -0400, bitrex Gave us:

Except He wasn't a man.

But then neither are you.

You prefer sharia law to the Ten Commandments?

Democrats obviously do. They haven't thought through what would happen to their precious rainbow flag under Sharia, though. They don't think.

Some Americans refuse to bake cakes for gay weddings; ISIS throws gays off roofs. In Saudi Arabia, the official punishment is stoning to death, but most people get prison and flogging.

I'd frankly prefer it if all the zealots from all the Abrahamic religions could somehow be shipped off to the British Mandate for Palestine or whatever they call it now, kind of like the "B" Ark with all the marketing executives, telephone sanitizers, and sales assistants in the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.

There they could fight it out over whom their one God (whom they believe to embody simultaneous characteristics which are logically impossible due to self-contradiction) loves most for all eternity. Or at least until the body count became unsustainable or they got tired. Three men enter! One man leaves!

You're getting crazier and crazier.

Good thing you're not in charge of much.

I'm glad as well. My Myers-Briggs personality type inventory (for whatever these 21st century starsigns are worth, which maybe isn't much) tells me that I'm not really leadership material. And that seems accurate - I don't really get any satisfaction at all out of telling others what to do. Conversely, I don't like a bunch of nosy nellys trying to use the legal system to enforce their weird religious morality structures on me, whether they be Christian, Muslim, or what have you.

I guess you're OK with having a bunch of zealots around who are unwilling to ever compromise, and want to bend the legal system to enforce the moral code they deem appropriate to whatever their sky god is feeling at the moment?

Up until October of last year in Massachusetts I couldn't buy beer on Sunday before noon. I guess I was supposed to be in church.

Enforcing "thou shalt not kill" and "thou shalt not steal" and "thou shalt not bear false witness" is pretty reasonable. Nobody enforces "Thou shall not covet your neighbor's wife" much, short of actual stalking. That's fine with me: my neighbor's wife is a guy.

You have to have some moral principles to form a legal code; Christianity isn't a bad place to start. Christianity itself isn't mandatory. Jesus took some of the harsher edges off Judiasm.

That's nothing like being crucified for breaking Ramadan.

How do you like it when secularists drive a bakery out of business for refusing an order?

On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:19:03 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso" Gave us:

Except that our hardware (and training) is an order of magnitude more superior.