Oh, and if you insist on contact fingers, try hammered silver. It produces nice springs, and even the oxide conducts. They might come to 4 dollars a piece, but satisfaction guaranteed.
Total bullshit. Gold plating that thin is for cheap "Monster" brand level stupid consumer products.
Mil contacts are NOT plated(pins and sockets)(switches are, but it is VERY heavy plating), and yes,the underlying material WOULD matter as that thin of a gold plating will be worn off after not too many cycles. The reason Gold is chosen when it is, is because it, like Platinum, NEVER oxidizes. If your "gold" contacts get a patina on them, they are NOT gold.
Bad news, Silver will easily meld with itself, and electrical current will actually help. High current will weld such a set of contacts together in pretty short order.
Phosphor Bronze is a bearing media, not an electrical switch contact media. D'oh!
BeCu is used for elements that need to be light in weight or have better corrosion properties, like phono cartridge needle arms, or the switch contact's "arm". It is not a very good electrical contact face media choice either.
For production? For production you just buy a damned part. An SSR or a switch based relay... even a miniature job. Hell, I have about ten in my junk box here. Everything from sealed explosion proof mil jobs down to opto-coupled micro-SSRs.
Sjouke, I'll need to make almost 800 tiny contacts(for just the initial prototype). And one end of each contact will to be soldered to fingerboards that have .156" traces.
As for silver I heard the oxide could be a resistance problem. (And it looks too expensive anyway).
George Herold, I just may have to plate anyway. :-(
Bill, That PDF wouldn't apply that much to me because what I'm making will only entail making and breaking connections *when there is no current*.
Stuart, I settled on Phosphor-Bronze because of what I thought would be it's spring temper, corrosion resistance, and electrical conductivity.(Not to mention cost).
John Fields, Platinum and Rhodium are too exotic to fit my parameters.
Rich Grise, As for why I didn't go with BeCu. One particular reason is that I need the spring of Phosphor-Bronze. As many as 56 out the almost 800 connections will have to be made at one time, and so I need to come up with a flexible backing for the unsoldered ned of the contacts to do this.
I'll need to make almost 800 tiny contacts(for just the initial prototype). And one end of each contact will to be soldered to fingerboards that have .156" traces.
As for silver I heard the oxide could be a resistance problem. (And it looks too expensive anyway).
George Herold,
I just may have to plate anyway. :-(
Bill,
That PDF wouldn't apply that much to me because what I'm making will only entail making and breaking connections *when there is no current*.
Stuart,
I settled on Phosphor-Bronze because of what I thought would be it's spring temper, corrosion resistance, and electrical conductivity.(Not to mention cost).
John Fields,
Platinum and Rhodium are too exotic to fit my parameters.
Rich Grise,
As for why I didn't go with BeCu. One particular reason is that I need the spring of Phosphor-Bronze. As many as 56 out the almost 800 connections will have to be made at one time, and so I need to come up with a flexible backing for the unsoldered ends of the contacts to do this.
That's a perfect storm: no high voltage, no wiping, means that any dust mote will prevent contact. That can only work reliably if you have high contact forces, or if you use reed switch parts (for the sealed glass envelope).
One possibility you might consider is zebra-stripe elastomer conductors; these are compliant enough to make a connection even if that dust mote shows up.
Zebra-stripe elastomer conductors would be too "exotic", expensive and would require a lot of redesigning, *if* they would work for what I'm doing.
I might however be able to incorporate wiping if I can determine a good material to use, outside of the contact material itself.(I can make it part of the switching mechanics).
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.