breadboarding

Aug 20, 2008 25 Replies

Put your bullet back in your pocket, Barney... :)

Don Bruder - dakidd@sonic.net - If your "From:" address isn\'t on my whitelist, or the subject of the message doesn\'t contain the exact text "PopperAndShadow" somewhere, any message sent to this address will go in the garbage without my ever knowing it arrived. Sorry... for more info

formatting link
*-*+1993-07+text+text+1995.*.*+without.cost+text+First.Public.Release+text+Debian.Project+SuSE.Linux+Slackware+text+text+Red.Hat.Linux

OS/2 2.0 came out in April, 1992. A spectacular technical success--multithreaded 32-bit OS, fully object-oriented GUI, a beautiful object model (SOM)...I could go on...but a stupid marketing failure. I still use OS/2 at least a few times a week, and I still love it.

Cheers,

Phil Hobbs

formatting link
*-*+1993-07+text+text+1995.*.*+without.cost+text+First.Public.Release+text+Debian.Project+SuSE.Linux+Slackware+text+text+Red.Hat.Linux

Well, absolutely. I was sure hoping OS/2 would make it but they blundered so badly in the marketing area that it's hard to believe. Essentially they could have eaten Microsoft's lunch but instead simply walked away from the table.

Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.

formatting link
*-*+1993-07+text+text+1995.*.*+without.cost+text+First.Public.Release+text+Debian.Project+SuSE.Linux+Slackware+text+text+Red.Hat.Linux

They simply didn't have the money.

Keith

formatting link
*-*+1993-07+text+text+1995.*.*+without.cost+text+First.Public.Release+text+Debian.Project+SuSE.Linux+Slackware+text+text+Red.Hat.Linux

Back then the money ratio was still in IBM's favor. IBM turned away because it would have eaten into their Power architecture 'nix workstation line. One more instance of killing the golden egg laying goose to save the lame duck product.

formatting link
*-*+1993-07+text+text+1995.*.*+without.cost+text+First.Public.Release+text+Debian.Project+SuSE.Linux+Slackware+text+text+Red.Hat.Linux

No, it wasn't. IBM was bust, by some *very* knowledgeable people, withing two or three weeks of missing payroll. There simply were more important places to put a few hundred million$.

Keith

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required