Why 'a plurality of N' must be used for 'N' in patent claims

Hi, Why 'a plurality of N' or 'the plurality of N' must be used fo 'N' in patent claims?

What is the difference between them?

I found all patents I have checked if a number N (>0, or >1) is used, 'a plurality of N' or 'the plurality of N' must be used.

I checked with English disctionanry and still don't get any clue.

Thank you.

Weng

Reply to
wtxwtx
Loading thread data ...

Because patents are written to be legal documents, not engineering documents. Legal documents are written using traditions that have evolved over hundreds of years. Since patent examiners, lawyers, and judges all expect patents to be written in a certain way, if you submit an application that isn't written that way, you're just wasting money.

Reply to
Eric Smith

Hi Robert, It is interesting to note that the styles for patent writing are changing with time.

In old patents, 'said' was used for 'the'.

Now I found in more patents approved in 2005, they only use 'the', never use 'said'.

It is very often now that a full sentence usually follows the 'wherein', instead of many separate words followed by descriptive words.

Thank you.

Weng

Reply to
wtxwtx

Again, that is what i call "patent-ese". Instead of "many" or "multiple" one sees "a plurality of". Like i said, follow the terminology and useage that you find in other patents that are closely related to your particular idea.

Reply to
Robert Baer

Legalese is designed to keep lawyers employed. It is not, by itself, "precise". Contracts and other legal documents written in "plain English" are just as enforceable as the legalese version. Maybe even more so, because a jury (non-lawyers) can understand them.

MOOYMMV.

Tom Seim

Reply to
soar2morrow

Legalese is a very precise language, quite comparable to computer languages. If you ever see "...time is of the essence..." in a contract, prepare to run.

--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org
Reply to
Dirk Bruere at Neopax

Perhaps, but the question pertains to terminology in patents.

Reply to
Robert Baer

You are forgetting that, by the very nature of the beast, Patents are designed to be as general as possible without seeming to digress onto other topics... like this thread.

Sim>

languages.

run.

Reply to
Simon Peacock

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.