voltage divider calcs

for".

Crappy, as in three years out of date.

Are you related to DimBulb? Altera was way behind the curve in I/O capability. Xilinx was too, but bought the IP (company) for the Virtex line. Altera sat there looking stupid.

Three years out of data for leading edge performance perhaps, but what % of users wanted that over 5V compatability (in 1998)?

You said "Altera crappy I/Os weren't fixable", but they were as spec'd in the data sheet.

I.e. not 'broken'.

Nial.

Most. 5V was already dead. PCs had even changed to 3.3V.

You *are* DimBulb's brother. I never said anything of the kind. I said they "sucked", which is a true statement.

You really need to learn how to read. ...and think.

From your previous posts, underlining is my emphasis.....

"No, hardware _that_works_ is always the priority."

"Altera crappy I/Os weren't _fixable_"

Whether they sucked or not is an _opinion_.

HEADLINE HEADLINE, Altera FPGA's IO performed as decribed in their data sheets!!!

There isn't much point continuing this.

Nial.

Now, go back and read the context, if you can. Altera hardware did *not* work in the application.

Yes, you've already demonstrated your illiteracy.

Duh. Now you're simply demonstrating your cluelessness.

sheets!!!

Sure, that's the weenie way. When you've been proven clueless, just claim victory and run away.