Valve frequency multipliers (followup)

Apr 05, 2025 Last reply: 1 year ago 9 Replies

You may remember a couple of month ago I was trying to derive 150 Mc/s from a 16.667 Mc/s crystal with two triode triplers. I now think I have found the cause of my problems:



The first tripler circuit didn't seem to tune up correctly and all sorts of spurious harmonics were coming out of it. There was never enough 50 Mc/s signal to drive the second tripler far enough into non-linearity, so the 150 Mc/s output was utterly feeble.



Eventually I decided I was never going to get it to work in the space available, which was only just big enough for one valve, so it would have to be split, with the first tripler in the oscillator box and the second tripler in another box. I decided to use a pentode (EF91) for the first tripler as it could be biassed to give a lot of distortion and a large anode voltage swing. Because there was now room available and a trimming capacitor to spare (which had previously been used to tune the



150 Mc/s coil), I abandoned the ferrite slug-tuned 50 Mc/s coil and wound an air-cored one instead.

The circuit gives a *huge* output, far more than ever before (and it is not due to self-oscillation or any other vice like that). I think the cause of the previous low output must have been the ferrite tuning slug, which probably wasn't rated for 50 Mc/s and was damping the circuit or saturating to give lots of unwanted harmonics.



There's plenty of work still to do, but at least one link in the chain is now working and I have an explanation of the probable reason why it didn't work before.


Air core inductors, simple coils, would have best Q at your frequencies.

All the 150 Mc/s coils are air-cored but the 50 Mc/s ones could have been either air or ferrite cored - or so I thought - wrongly!

The formers were some NOS ones that had about 40 turns of wire on them, bfeore I stripped them and wound on 7 turns for 50 Mc/s. That looks as though they were originally intended to work somewhere around 1 Mc/s and presumably the ferrite core would have been optimised for that frequemcy range.

I am now beginning to wonder about the other inductors in the crystal 'pulling' circuits, which are running at about 15 Mc/s and come from the same batch. The behaviour of the oscillator had been somewhat strange at times, so the cores could be causing trouble there too.

455 KHz IF maybe?

I've wound high-Q inductors on a Sharpie.

formatting link
All the commercial inductors that I tried (pcb revs A and B) fried.

Probably not: the wire was layered, whereas all the 455 Kc/s I.F. transformers I have seen were wave wound with Litz wire to give the highest possible 'Q'. - and they had a lot more than 40 turns.

I'm not after a particularly high 'Q', but if the coils are stupidly 'flat', that might explain why I had such difficulty getting a good signal out of the oscillator. I'm in unknown territory with this circuit, as the crystal frequency has to be modulated on transmit and pulled on receive. The partially-complete circuit of the Xtal oscillator and multiplier chain is at:

formatting link
The block diagram explains the reason for needing these particularfrequencies:
formatting link
I wind my air-cored coils on the shanks of drill bits or on the barrels of nut-drivers to give a known repeatable diameter. The wire is some fairly hefty stuff with insulating varnish which has to be filed off before soldering (if doesn't self-flux like many modern winding wires).

Decent coax is pretty good too--to make an inductor at 150 MHz takes only a few inches of coax with a short at the other end.

I like to tune coaxial stubs using thumbtacks--you stick it through the shield and the center conductor. It survives very well, so you can do this many times on one piece of coax.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

That's an excellent idea, I hadn't thought of doing it that way. It might be a bit tricky 'tapping' such an inductor for various loads.

You tap it Colpitts-style when necessary. That isn't as good as tapping a tightly-coupled coil such as a gapped toroid, because the impedance change comes only from the tank Q, rather than tank Q plus transformer action.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

If you use an 'open' transmission line, such as a trough line, then you do get a transformer effect. Most UHF television tuners used trough lines with tappings to match the aerial impedance to the transistors and still retain a reasonable 'Q' for tuning.

Leak even did it at VHF in their FM tuner but I don't know whether it gave any advantages (I believe some of their designs were actually made under licence from the BBC and weren't designed by H.J. Leak at all.)

You do get different impedances at different points, but that’s just on account of the circulating power, as in a Colpitts. It falls apart completely at low Q.

With tight inductive coupling, as in an ideal Hartley, the coupling ratio is nearly independent of Q.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required