Solutions for long range (3-5KM) RF communication?

Michael Noone · 2005-04-24T07:16:31+00:00

Hi - I need to establish a bi-directional data link between a ground station and an aerial vehicle. Distance should be at most 3KM and should be in a relatively flat area, but there is the possibility that there will be buildings in the way, so the stronger the signal the better. As far as data rate goes, 10KBps would be great, but a lesser data rate would be OK as well. The ground station will have plenty of power available to it, but the aerial vehicle will have a much more limited power supply, so the less power it uses the better. Another limiting factor is weight and size - really the smaller the better when it comes to weight/size. Ideally I'd like to come up with something the size of an altoids tin.I have been looking at the Nordic Semiconductor nRF905() - I have been told that it has a good range, but I have never heard numbers, and I don't know how to translate specs to numbers (ie how to go from mw or db to meters). Could anybody explain that to me? Or if it is fairly complicated - point me to a good resource on the topic? Obviously - I am no expert when it comes to RF. I have also looked at some RF chips made by Linx Technologies, though the Nordic chips are much more attractive (besides the awful QFN 32L package)So - does anybody have any suggestions as to good RF solutions for this application? Thanks so much for your time!Michael J. Noone

Apr 24, 2005 23 Replies

Rate this thread:

John Woodgate 21 years ago

I read in sci.electronics.design that "RST Engineering (jw)" wrote (in ) about 'Solutions for long range (3-5KM) RF communication?', on Mon, 25 Apr 2005:

But he's got a bad shadowing problem due to tall buildings. I'm not even sure that a lower frequency than 27 MHz might not be better.

Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. There are two sides to every question, except 'What is a Moebius strip?' http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

Vote

Michael Noone 21 years ago

"RST Engineering \\(jw\\)" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@corp.supernews.com:

This is the aircraft:

formatting link

. Current power source is some sort of 12V battery which is being shared with a low power computer. I've been told the vehicle can carry something along the lines of

15 pounds. I expect the current equipment onboard weighs somewhere along the line of 5-8.

Thanks again,

-Michael J. Noone

Vote

Frithiof Andreas Jensen 21 years ago

.... Maybe Not:

Using a mobile terminal in an aerial vehicle *may well* be illegal - it messes up the network because the mobile will cover many more cells than the network was designed for so you will be soaking up more ressources than planned (i.e. a DOS attack ;-)

The unlicensed WiFi IEEE 811.x.x, e.t.c. do not carry such limitations. WiFi will travel a very long way with a decent antenna (but directional, l.o.s.).

Vote