Reactionless drive with a super-conductors and a Josephson junction based on generating gravity waves

Dec 30, 2025 Last reply: 6 months ago 1 Replies

I was reading



formatting link
When I got down to the section on "microscopic sources" I came across a proposal for a GASER invovling a 10cm cube of cuprate high-temperature super-conductor written up in



Modanese, Giovanni; A. Robertson, Glen, eds. (2012). Gravity-Superconductors Interactions: Theory and Experiment. Bentham Science Publishers. doi:10.2174/97816080539951120101. ISBN



978-1-60805-400-8.

It sounds like a more practical destination for our Italian's $24 million of crowd-funding money - still not all that practical, but slightly less off-the-wall.



A black-hole merger seems to have generated enough momentum to kick the fused black hole produced out of the core of the galaxy that had formed around its progenitors. It's not a reactionless drive - gravity waves have energy and momentum - but the example is an attention getting.


I have been reading about Podkletnov:

formatting link
it was one reason I played with my cry-cooler:
formatting link
interesting is the work of Ning Lee:
formatting link
Anyways after my trip to Mars and camping there I was amazed nobuddy else made it there No shops.. had to come back.

Also interesting is the ideas of 'A guy called 'Uncle Al' in scy.physics many years a ago, I see postings from him as far back as 2008 on my system.

I criticized him for using chirality to make a vacuum propeller (taken that I understood his experiment). I did read some Chinese scientist did his experiment and had zero results.

But if you understand space is not empty then the idea of rotating a chiral medium for propulsion is not so strange. A super conducting chiral medium could be more effective / stable as propeller for 'you name it' dark matter, what not. You would need the right material, you know more about chirality than I do so grab your chance :-)

Yea, hundred dollars should be enough. OK, plus King Kong's import tariffs..

There are so many different ideas about black holes, science.daily has one almost every day.. I read those, but putting the links in this group upsets John L.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required